2017
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/783/1/012025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Constraint Satisfactions for a Quadcopter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MPC is an optimization-based technique for controlling the attitude of a quadcopter [45]. It requires the solution of a finite-horizon optimal control challenge subjected to the quadcopter rotational dynamics established in the previous section, reference inputs from BC, and trajectory and state limitations introduced on the quadcopter.…”
Section: Model Predictive Control Structure and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPC is an optimization-based technique for controlling the attitude of a quadcopter [45]. It requires the solution of a finite-horizon optimal control challenge subjected to the quadcopter rotational dynamics established in the previous section, reference inputs from BC, and trajectory and state limitations introduced on the quadcopter.…”
Section: Model Predictive Control Structure and Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to [18]- [21] that deal with related topics, we also take into account actuator limitations in our formulation, thus showing that the various sensitivity quantities and related gradients can also be used in a nonlinear optimization context (opening the door to consider even more complex constraints). As opposed to classical approaches to robust planning/control, such as belief space [22] or robust MPC [23], which need to evaluate the worst-case deviation caused by uncertainty by large-scale sampling, here we address the robustness by increasing the predictability of inputs and outputs over a trajectory by minimizing a (much simpler) single sensitivity index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it has been shown that the closed‐loop responses of the linear MPC and NMPC for trajectory tracking under external disturbances are comparable, while the NMPC has demonstrated slightly better disturbance rejection capability. A NMPC has been introduced in [9] for trajectory tracking control of a quadcopter unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) considering the system constraints in the design steps. Both position and velocity components of the vehicle have been utilised in the optimisation problem of the MPC in order to provide a precise trajectory tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%