2022
DOI: 10.3389/frai.2022.811563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Noise Cleaning in Gravitational-Wave Detectors With Convolutional Neural Networks

Abstract: Currently, the sub-60 Hz sensitivity of gravitational-wave (GW) detectors like Advanced LIGO (aLIGO) is limited by the control noises from auxiliary degrees of freedom which nonlinearly couple to the main GW readout. One promising way to tackle this challenge is to perform nonlinear noise mitigation using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which we examine in detail in this study. In many cases, the noise coupling is bilinear and can be viewed as a few fast channels' outputs modulated by some slow channels.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to have an accurate and unbiased catalog of GW events, effective and generic methods for separating signal and glitch power are necessary. Proposed approaches for glitch subtraction include removing the contaminated data [23,[26][27][28][29][30] or subtracting detector noise based on data from auxiliary channels [13,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. The glitches discussed in this paper are those that remain after the noise mitigation described in [35,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to have an accurate and unbiased catalog of GW events, effective and generic methods for separating signal and glitch power are necessary. Proposed approaches for glitch subtraction include removing the contaminated data [23,[26][27][28][29][30] or subtracting detector noise based on data from auxiliary channels [13,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. The glitches discussed in this paper are those that remain after the noise mitigation described in [35,39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 5) by √ 2. To tackle the nonstationarities in the interferometer, one could utilize auxiliary channels in LIGO [78,79]. Furthermore, with auxiliary channels one could predict not only the expected spectrum of the quantum shot noise P a but also other noise sources across the entire spectra.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weiner filtering is particularly useful in cases where a linear coupling exists between the noise source and the gravitational-wave strain data. Additional subtraction procedures based on machine learning [127][128][129] are also being explored. These new methods have shown promise in subtracting sources of noise that exhibit non-linear couplings to the gravitational-wave strain.…”
Section: Noise Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%