2019
DOI: 10.1155/2019/4153287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Numerical Simulation for Oscillating Pressure in Cavity and Passive Control Research

Abstract: Prediction of oscillating pressure is a key technology for cavity research. Nonlinear Acoustic Solver (NLAS) is applied to analyze aeroacoustics recently. A nonlinear numerical solver is combined with the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) method. RANS is applied to solving the flow field around a cavity, and average solution of initial turbulent statistics is obtained which contains the basic characteristics of the average flow field and statistic description of turbulence fluctuation. The source of acous… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the high cost of wind tunnel tests, computational aeroacoustics (CAA) has become a tendency to calculate the pneumatic noise. 3 At present, large eddy simulation (LES), detached eddy simulation (DES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation (RANS/LES) are common calculation methods applied for the supersonic flow field and aerodynamic noise. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] However, for high Reynolds number flows, the calculation cost of the above methods is still very high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high cost of wind tunnel tests, computational aeroacoustics (CAA) has become a tendency to calculate the pneumatic noise. 3 At present, large eddy simulation (LES), detached eddy simulation (DES) and Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation (RANS/LES) are common calculation methods applied for the supersonic flow field and aerodynamic noise. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] However, for high Reynolds number flows, the calculation cost of the above methods is still very high.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%