2007
DOI: 10.1080/00207170600849527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear observers for Lipschitz continuous systems with inputs

Abstract: This paper considers the state observation problem for nonlinear dynamical systems. The proposed framework is a direct generalization of a method introduced in a recent paper for autonomous system. Its characteristic feature is that the dynamic part of the observer is linear and, as a consequence, that convergence takes place globally in the observer coordinates. The observer is completed by a static nonlinearity which maps the observer state in the original state space. An associated observation mapping is in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as we know, no result concerning this problem exists in the literature apart from [14], [15] which follows and extends [16]. The idea pursued in [14] belongs to the first path : the transformation is stationary and the input is seen as a disturbance which must be small enough.…”
Section: Introduction a Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As far as we know, no result concerning this problem exists in the literature apart from [14], [15] which follows and extends [16]. The idea pursued in [14] belongs to the first path : the transformation is stationary and the input is seen as a disturbance which must be small enough.…”
Section: Introduction a Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as we know, no result concerning this problem exists in the literature apart from [14], [15] which follows and extends [16]. The idea pursued in [14] belongs to the first path : the transformation is stationary and the input is seen as a disturbance which must be small enough. Although the construction is extended in a cunning fashion to a larger class of inputs, namely those which can be considered as output of a linear generator model with small external input, this approach remains theoretic and restrictive.…”
Section: Introduction a Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a problem can be recast as the problem of state-observation for dynamical systems (1) that can be put into the form ( 54), (55), in which the function ϕ n z is possibly tdependent. Following the prescriptions of Section 6.2, one can simply design a high-gain observer of the form ż = Aẑ + D K(y − Cẑ) (87) in which the copy of the term ϕ n z is ignored in the observer dynamics. The observer ( 87) is also often denoted as dirtyderivative observer, see, e.g., [225].…”
Section: Pure Differentiatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After first steps in [202,230] for linear time-varying systems, an extension of the Luenberger design to nonlinear controlled systems was considered in [87], following the ideas of [137]. In [87], injectivity of a time-varying transformation T is proved only under a so-called "finite-complexity" assumption, originally introduced in [137] for autonomous systems. Unfortunately, this property is very restrictive and hard to check.…”
Section: Time-varying/controlled Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%