2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear predictive control for durability enhancement and efficiency improvement in a fuel cell power system

Abstract: In this work, a nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) strategy is proposed to improve the efficiency and enhance the durability of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) power system. The PEMFC controller is based on a distributed parameters model that describes the nonlinear dynamics of the system, considering spatial variations along the gas channels. Parasitic power from different system auxiliaries is considered, including the main parasitic losses which are those of the compressor. A nonlinear o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Typically, noncausal DP and CP can only be implemented offline, as driving cycles must be known beforehand. To explore the possibility of online optimized energy management, causal optimization methods, e.g., equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS) [23], [24], Pontryagin's Minimum Principle (PMP) [25], [26], and model predictive control (MPC) [27], [28], were adopted. These controllers with appropriate design and tuning always produce a satisfactory performance in energy consumption, operating cost, or the total cost of vehicle ownership.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, noncausal DP and CP can only be implemented offline, as driving cycles must be known beforehand. To explore the possibility of online optimized energy management, causal optimization methods, e.g., equivalent consumption minimization strategy (ECMS) [23], [24], Pontryagin's Minimum Principle (PMP) [25], [26], and model predictive control (MPC) [27], [28], were adopted. These controllers with appropriate design and tuning always produce a satisfactory performance in energy consumption, operating cost, or the total cost of vehicle ownership.…”
Section: B Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, it is not entirely clear how to accurately establish the power rate limits to assure non-premature ageing of FCs. Quantifying degradation in FCs is a complex task because the degradation rate strongly depends on the internal conditions [20,21]. Although some authors do not consider power rate constraints in the fuel cell [22,23,24,25], values between 2% and 20% of its maximum power per second are usually adopted [26,27,10,18,28,29,14,30].…”
Section: Fuel Cell Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid internal oxygen starvation and inappropriate water content, Luno et al. established a stack model with static two‐phase flow and supply air with a single control variable air supply system, and designed a controller based on the nonlinear MRC method for the air supply system. Based on a simplified nonlinear control model and using the differential flatness control theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to realize the control of a 150 KW fuel cell engine, Liu et al [8] established a single state quantity air supply system model, and designed a feedback control strategy based on PI control theory. In order to avoid internal oxygen starvation and inappropriate water content, Luno et al [9] established a stack model with static twophase flow and supply air with a single control variable air supply system, and designed a controller based on the nonlinear MRC method for the air supply system. Based on a simplified nonlinear control model and using the differential flatness control theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%