2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear seismic response of a gravity dam under near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…And then the Bessel function is used to determine the reduction coefficient when Δ equals 0, and the relationship curves between the mutation factor Δ and the strength reduction factor k are plotted (Figures 15 and 16). It can be seen from the figures that after increasing the strength parameters at the dam foundation by 20%, the dynamic stability safety factor at the dam toe is equal to 2.58368, y = 0.001x 4 -0.010x 3 + 0.022x 2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering which is slightly larger than that with the parameters not increased (2.58089). And the dynamic stability safety factor at the dam heel is 2.58790, which is slightly greater than that with the parameters not increased (2.57759).…”
Section: Granite Sandstonementioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…And then the Bessel function is used to determine the reduction coefficient when Δ equals 0, and the relationship curves between the mutation factor Δ and the strength reduction factor k are plotted (Figures 15 and 16). It can be seen from the figures that after increasing the strength parameters at the dam foundation by 20%, the dynamic stability safety factor at the dam toe is equal to 2.58368, y = 0.001x 4 -0.010x 3 + 0.022x 2 Mathematical Problems in Engineering which is slightly larger than that with the parameters not increased (2.58089). And the dynamic stability safety factor at the dam heel is 2.58790, which is slightly greater than that with the parameters not increased (2.57759).…”
Section: Granite Sandstonementioning
confidence: 91%
“…rough the above analysis, it can be drawn that when the strength parameters at the dam foundation are decreased y = 0.002x 4 -0.015x 3 + 0.034x 2…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysis To the Strength Parameters Of Thementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a well-shaped gravity dam that has been extensively studied in literature [39][40][41][42]. e Advances in Civil Engineeringdam is two-dimensionally modeled in a plane-stress manner along with its full reservoir utilizing the finite element method, as shown in Figure 1; the water-structure dynamic interaction is considered employing Eulerian-Lagrangian formulation.…”
Section: Dam Model and Ground Motion Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yazdani and Alembagheri [25] proposed a seismic demand model of dams to estimate the vulnerability of the gravity dam subjected to the near-fault earthquakes. Yazdani et al [26] compared the dynamic characteristics of a gravity dam under forward-directivity (FD) and normal near-fault seismic records, and the impacts of FD records on the seismic demand analysis of structures were discussed. Pang et al [27] established a new reliability assessment method for the dam, and the random dynamic response of rockfill dam slopes under near-fault earthquakes was evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%