2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.yofte.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear signal–noise interactions in dispersion-managed links with various modulation formats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that the transmission performance of a fiber-optical system will ultimately be limited by non-deterministic nonlinear effects, such as nonlinear signal-noise interaction (NSNI) between the transmitted signal and the amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise [17]- [19]. The impact of NSNI has been studied extensively through numerical simulations and through experiments [20], [21]. In these works, ASE noise is loaded at the receiver as a single additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is known that the transmission performance of a fiber-optical system will ultimately be limited by non-deterministic nonlinear effects, such as nonlinear signal-noise interaction (NSNI) between the transmitted signal and the amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) noise [17]- [19]. The impact of NSNI has been studied extensively through numerical simulations and through experiments [20], [21]. In these works, ASE noise is loaded at the receiver as a single additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these works, ASE noise is loaded at the receiver as a single additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) process. This system is then compared with a system where noise is distributed [20] and ASE noise is added as a single AWGN at the transmitter [21]. Both these studies revealed that there is a significant penalty due to NSNI for dispersion-managed links and the severity of the NSNI is dependent on the symbol rate and modulation formats used in the system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, for 100% inline dispersion compensation map (zero residual dispersion per span), we see that for PM-4QAM transmissions the performance may only be slightly improved even after extending the back-propagation calculation to full bandwidth (nine channels), and the BER is always worse than 5x10 -2 , regardless of the number of channels included in back-propagation. We attribute this effect to the irreversible incorporation of ASE into the signal by strongly quasi phase matched signal-ASE nonlinearities, where the origin of such effects could either be XPM [36] or FWM [37]. On the contrary, for the PM-16QAM system using 100% inline dispersion compensation map, we observe that the overall system performance is strongly dependent on the number of neighbouring channels back-propagated and a BER improvement of ~1.5 decades is observed for MC-BP in contrast to SC-BP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, each signal will have different performance which must be taken into account in designing and operating newly upgraded systems. The interaction of dispersion and non-linearity in optical fiber is investigated for optical communication systems with independent 10G or 40G modulated signals and for a single MUX/DEMUX bandwidth [15]- [18]. The interaction for hybrid communication system is not published -to the best of our knowledge-and cannot be foreseen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%