1984
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1114-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Singular Perturbation Phenomena

Abstract: EDITORIAL STATEMENTThe mathematization of all sciences, the fading of traditional scientific boundaries, the impact of computer technology, the growing importance of mathematicalcomputer modelling and the necessity of scientific planning all create the need both in education and research for books that are introductory to and abreast of these developments.The purpose of this series is to provide such books, suitable for the user of mathematics, the mathematician interested in applications, and the student scie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first place, both of them are singularly perturbed [17,21] and for this reason, their modes of stability loss have the shapes of boundary effects, usually localized in boundary zones. Secondly, as a rule, these modes represent damping out oscillating harmonics.…”
Section: Equations Of Critical States Of the Ds Inside Inclined Bore-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first place, both of them are singularly perturbed [17,21] and for this reason, their modes of stability loss have the shapes of boundary effects, usually localized in boundary zones. Secondly, as a rule, these modes represent damping out oscillating harmonics.…”
Section: Equations Of Critical States Of the Ds Inside Inclined Bore-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the functions v i , 0 ≤ i ≤ 4 are defined to be the solutions for the following first order problems 2) and the last function v 5 satisfies the second order problem…”
Section: Error Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The truncation error of F in approximating F ε in terms of y is defined to be F y−F ε y ∞ . It is clear that (F y) 0 = (F ε y)(0) and (F y) N = (F ε y) (1). We shall bound |(F y) i − (F ε y)(x i )|, for i = 1, 2, .…”
Section: A Central Difference Scheme On a Shishkin Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See for example Chang and Howes [1], D'Annunzio [2], Fife [4], Herceg [7], Herceg and Petrović [8] and Lorenz [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%