2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2001.02492
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Traffic Prediction as a Matrix Completion Problem with Ensemble Learning

Wenqing Li,
Chuhan Yang,
Saif Eddin Jabari

Abstract: We focus on short-term traffic forecasting for traffic operations management. Specifically, we focus on forecasting traffic network sensor states in high-resolution (second-by-second). Most work on traffic forecasting has focused on predicting aggregated traffic variables, typically over intervals that are no shorter than 5 minutes. We develop a (big) data-driven methodology for forecasting sensor states in high-resolution. Our contributions can be summarized as offering three major insights: first, we show ho… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, these methods are restricted by the representational power of the selected traffic flow model, and require additional inputs such as initial and boundary conditions and traffic flow model parameters. Furthermore, their estimations are often coarse grained, i.e., most studies assume an estimation interval of 100 − 500 m × 5 − 15 minutes (with an exception of a few recent studies [13]) and are not suitable for arbitrary space-time resolutions. The latter is a drawback of the numerical scheme used in solving the traffic flow model; for e.g., in the Eulerian coordinate system, the mesh sizes in the space and time dimensions are restricted by the Courant-Fredich-Lewy (CFL) condition [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods are restricted by the representational power of the selected traffic flow model, and require additional inputs such as initial and boundary conditions and traffic flow model parameters. Furthermore, their estimations are often coarse grained, i.e., most studies assume an estimation interval of 100 − 500 m × 5 − 15 minutes (with an exception of a few recent studies [13]) and are not suitable for arbitrary space-time resolutions. The latter is a drawback of the numerical scheme used in solving the traffic flow model; for e.g., in the Eulerian coordinate system, the mesh sizes in the space and time dimensions are restricted by the Courant-Fredich-Lewy (CFL) condition [20].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common type of machine learning tool used in data-driven approaches is deep learning (DL), specifically deep neural networks (DNNs) [5,12,20,24,34,40,56]. Other techniques include support vector machines [57], case based reasoning [21], random forests [13], decision trees [35], gradient boosting [65], kernel regression [59], principal component analysis [26], and matrix factorization methods [29,30]. The estimation results from data-driven methods are often reported to be more accurate than model-based approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%