2015
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4738-14.2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Transfer of Signal and Noise Correlations in Cortical Networks

Abstract: Signal and noise correlations, a prominent feature of cortical activity, reflect the structure and function of networks during sensory processing. However, in addition to reflecting network properties, correlations are also shaped by intrinsic neuronal mechanisms. Here we show that spike threshold transforms correlations by creating nonlinear interactions between signal and noise inputs; even when input noise correlation is constant, spiking noise correlation varies with both the strength and correlation of si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Formally, the nonlinear transfer between continuous input and spike response ensures that ρ < ρ x 92,37,39,93,94 , yet the influence of the nonlinearity can be controlled by several factors. In many neuron models L increases with the firing rate of a neuron resulting in a relationship between firing rates and ρ 37,38,95 . This prediction has been verified in a variety of experimental studies 25,96,10,95 , and firing rate is often a core determinant of output correlation 45 .…”
Section: Three Mechanisms Of Correlation Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Formally, the nonlinear transfer between continuous input and spike response ensures that ρ < ρ x 92,37,39,93,94 , yet the influence of the nonlinearity can be controlled by several factors. In many neuron models L increases with the firing rate of a neuron resulting in a relationship between firing rates and ρ 37,38,95 . This prediction has been verified in a variety of experimental studies 25,96,10,95 , and firing rate is often a core determinant of output correlation 45 .…”
Section: Three Mechanisms Of Correlation Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many neuron models L increases with the firing rate of a neuron resulting in a relationship between firing rates and ρ 37,38,95 . This prediction has been verified in a variety of experimental studies 25,96,10,95 , and firing rate is often a core determinant of output correlation 45 . However, in general, output spiking correlations and firing rate do not have a prescribed relation, as our examples illustrate (Fig.…”
Section: Three Mechanisms Of Correlation Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a number of modeling studies have explored the impact of correlations on sensory coding (Shadlen et al, 1996; de la Rocha et al, 2007; Averbeck et al, 2006; Pillow et al, 2008; Ecker et al, 2011; Moreno-Bote et al, 2014), there have been few efforts to identify their biophysical origin; the standard assumption that correlations arise from common input noise (de la Rocha et al, 2007; Doiron et al, 2016; Lyamzin et al, 2015) simply pushes the correlations from spiking to the membrane voltage without providing insight into their genesis. Models that use external noise to create correlations have been used in theoretical investigations of how network dynamics can transform correlations (Doiron et al, 2016), but no physiological source for the external noise used in these models has yet been identified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, each neuron is also a contributing member of the network. And although the relationship is complex (Carandini 2004), the nature of the synaptic inputs is likely extremely relevant to that of output spiking activity (Doiron et al 2016;Litwin-Kumar et al 2011;Lyamzin et al 2015). We therefore hypothesize that the broad g-LFP coupling distribution observed here corresponds to the diverse spike-spike population coupling observed elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%