2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6911(01)00197-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinearizable single-input control systems do not admit stationary symmetries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Ψ being a symmetry of X means that the induced diffeomorphism ϕ is a symmetry of X in the sense of [18] and [28].…”
Section: Symmetries and First Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Ψ being a symmetry of X means that the induced diffeomorphism ϕ is a symmetry of X in the sense of [18] and [28].…”
Section: Symmetries and First Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an application of canonical form, Respondek-Tall [29] and [30] studied the symmetry of nonlinear systems. For linearly controllable and analytic systems that are not feedback linearizable, the group of stationary symmetries contains at most two elements and the group of non stationary symmetries consist of at most two 1-parameter families.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has a strong differential geometric structure, which yields a local convergence property around any trajectory of the aircraft. Symmetries have been used in control theory for feedback design and optimal control, see for instance [3], [4], [8], [9], [5], [10] but seemingly much less for observer design [2], [1]. This paper also proposes a theory for invariant observers extending the ideas and results of [1]; it can be seen as the counterpart for observer design of [5] for invariant tracking controller design.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%