2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.80.084002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonmarginal Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi-like models with inverse triad corrections from loop quantum gravity

Abstract: Marginal LTB models with corrections from loop quantum gravity have recently been studied with an emphasis on potential singularity resolution. This paper corroborates and extends the analysis in two regards: (i) the whole class of LTB models, including non-marginal ones, is considered, and (ii) an alternative procedure to derive anomaly-free models is presented which first implements anomaly-freedom in spherical symmetry and then the LTB conditions rather than the other way around. While the two methods give … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
84
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible solution to this problem is to implement holonomy modifications in an anomaly-free way which does not break any gauge transformations but may deform the classical structure of hypersurface deformations given in [63,64]. Consistent deformations are possible in spherically symmetric models with holonomy modifications [71,72,73,74,75,76,77], but they imply a non-classical space-time structure which is related to slicing independence only in some cases, and after field redefinitions [78,79]. The latter feature not only resolves the contradiction between holonomy modifications and covariance pointed out in [11], it also shows why singularities can be resolved in loop quantum cosmology even for matter obeying the usual energy conditions: Not only the dynamics but also space-time structure become non-classical as a consequence of holonomy modifications, unhinging the mathematical foundation of singularity theorems.…”
Section: Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible solution to this problem is to implement holonomy modifications in an anomaly-free way which does not break any gauge transformations but may deform the classical structure of hypersurface deformations given in [63,64]. Consistent deformations are possible in spherically symmetric models with holonomy modifications [71,72,73,74,75,76,77], but they imply a non-classical space-time structure which is related to slicing independence only in some cases, and after field redefinitions [78,79]. The latter feature not only resolves the contradiction between holonomy modifications and covariance pointed out in [11], it also shows why singularities can be resolved in loop quantum cosmology even for matter obeying the usual energy conditions: Not only the dynamics but also space-time structure become non-classical as a consequence of holonomy modifications, unhinging the mathematical foundation of singularity theorems.…”
Section: Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, it was realized in a series of articles [49][50][51][52][53][54] that under suitable conditions, one can construct regularizations where the deformed algebra of constraints remain closed 3 . The consequences of this deformed covariance was then investigated in depth in the context of spherically symmetric backgrounds [60][61][62] and then extended to more general symmetry reduced models in [63][64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Techniques to handle inhomogeneous systems [17,18] are still under development [26][27][28] (see also Ref. [29]), but they do not easily reveal the physical picture.…”
Section: Gravitational Collapse With a Scalar Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Written in advanced EddingtonFinkelstein coordinates (v, r v , θ, φ), it has the form [37][38][39] 18) where M (r v , v) is a generic function of r v and v, which is fixed by matching the Eq. (2.18) with Eq.…”
Section: Gravitational Collapse With a Scalar Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation