2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10198-006-0346-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonmedical economic consequences attributable to visual impairment

Abstract: The nonmedical costs of visual impairment are crucial when allocating resources for prevention or treatment programs. Were analyzed the data from two representative nationwide French surveys aimed at documenting impairments that included 14,603 subjects living in institutions and 16,945 in the community. Three groups were identified: blind (light perception), low vision (loss of shape perception, LV), and controls. Item consumption was standardized on confounding factors using logistic regression. Costs attrib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The wide range of time and resources spent on informal care provision demonstrates the broad economic impact and considerable burden of informal care provision with concurrent expenses at a personal and societal level. Again, the reported cost aspects and methodologies differ considerably with, for example, Keeffe et al 24 reporting out-of-pocket expenses and Lafuma et al 26 reporting time spent on caring using an hourly rate. The multitude of differing approaches in each study does not allow for a head-to-head comparison but gives a comprehensive impression of the complex cost situation and highlights the importance of providing assistance to VI&B (table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wide range of time and resources spent on informal care provision demonstrates the broad economic impact and considerable burden of informal care provision with concurrent expenses at a personal and societal level. Again, the reported cost aspects and methodologies differ considerably with, for example, Keeffe et al 24 reporting out-of-pocket expenses and Lafuma et al 26 reporting time spent on caring using an hourly rate. The multitude of differing approaches in each study does not allow for a head-to-head comparison but gives a comprehensive impression of the complex cost situation and highlights the importance of providing assistance to VI&B (table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Received social allowances were detailed in one study but not counted towards the overall costs as they were considered as transfer costs 29. One study included the loss of caregivers’ time, which is spent not only on support in terms of productivity loss but also as a loss of personal time and time to engage in leisure activities 26. Equal to other cost components, indirect costs correlated with the degree of visual impairment, with the highest indirect costs reported for blind persons.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Costs associated with visual impairment are considerable, and include medical care, loss of income and paid home help. A 2006 study in France [4] estimated that total country-wide nonmedical costs of visual impairment were h9800 million per annum. A similar study in Australia [5] estimated that the 2004 cost for vision disorders was Australian dollars ($A)9850 million.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was estimated by the centers that participated in the retrospective European study, for each type of complication identifi ed in a review of the literature. 17…”
Section: Consumption Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These costs were estimated at 7,242/person/year and 16,679/person/year, for low vision and blindness, respectively, in France. 17…”
Section: Indirect Unit Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%