2013
DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.22386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonmetric cranial trait variation and population history of medieval east slavic tribes

Abstract: The population history of the East Slavs is complicated. There are still many unanswered questions relating to the origins and formation of the East Slavic gene pool. The aims of the current study were as follows: (1) to assess the degree of biological affinity in medieval East Slavic tribes and to test the hypothesis that East Slavic peoples have a common origin; (2) to show their genetic connections to the autochthonous populations of the northern part of Eastern Europe (Baltic and Finno-Ugric tribes); and (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cranial traits are more appropriate than postcranial traits for evaluation by the SC, as observed in previous studies (Berry & Berry, ; Hauser & De Stefano, ). This finding has been proven by prior studies (Sjøvold, ; Rösing, ; Spence, ; Velemínský & Dobisíková, ; Carson, ; Movsesian, ). It may be caused by several factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Cranial traits are more appropriate than postcranial traits for evaluation by the SC, as observed in previous studies (Berry & Berry, ; Hauser & De Stefano, ). This finding has been proven by prior studies (Sjøvold, ; Rösing, ; Spence, ; Velemínský & Dobisíková, ; Carson, ; Movsesian, ). It may be caused by several factors.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This study is based on nonmetric cranial traits, which have been widely used as phenetic markers to evaluate the genetic relationships among ancient populations (e.g., Berry & Berry, ; Buikstra, ; Dodo, Doi, & Kondo, ; González Jose, Dahinten, & Hernandez, ; Hanihara et al, ; Lahr, ; Movsesian, ; Movsesian, Bakholdina, & Pezhemsky, ; Nikita, Mattingly, & Lahr, ; Ossenberg, ; Ricaut & Waelkens, ; Stefan & Chapman, ; Stojanowski & Schillaci, ; Sutter & Mertz, ). Indirect evidence suggests that observable variations in skull structure are largely determined by genetic factors and that many cranial traits are highly heritable (Carson, ; Rösing, ; Sjøvold, ;Veleminský & Dobisíková, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This notion was first used by McGrath et al (1984) as already described and still adopted by many authors (e.g. Donlon, 2000;Hallgrímsson et al, 2005;Nikita et al, 2012;Movsesian, 2013;Stojanowski et al, 2018). This is a typical false myth created by habitual use of a baseless approach.…”
Section: Inter-side Correlations Justifying the Use Of Icfmentioning
confidence: 97%