2017
DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.117.198663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nononcologic Applications of PET/CT and PET/MRI in Musculoskeletal, Orthopedic, and Rheumatologic Imaging: General Considerations, Techniques, and Radiopharmaceuticals

Abstract: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is often underutilized in the field of musculoskeletal imaging, with key reasons including the excellent performance of conventional musculoskeletal MRI, the limited spatial resolution of PET, and the lack of reimbursement for PET for non-oncologic musculoskeletal indications. However, with improvements in PET/CT and PET/MR imaging over the last decade as well as an increased understanding of the pathophysiology of musculoskeletal diseases, there is an emerging potential for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14,35 Further interesting developments in aiding in diagnosis are PET-computed tomography (CT) and PETmagnetic resonance (MR), which show promising early results. 4,16,33 Rastogi et al reported the sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET-CT to be 83.3% and 100%, compared with 83.3% and 63.6% for contrast-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of diabetic foot OM in the background of CN. 33 Previous systemic reviews of the literature (including the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot's consensus scheme for the diagnosis of diabetic foot OM) and meta-analyses have proposed specific criteria for differentiation of CN from OM.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,35 Further interesting developments in aiding in diagnosis are PET-computed tomography (CT) and PETmagnetic resonance (MR), which show promising early results. 4,16,33 Rastogi et al reported the sensitivity and specificity of FDG PET-CT to be 83.3% and 100%, compared with 83.3% and 63.6% for contrast-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of diabetic foot OM in the background of CN. 33 Previous systemic reviews of the literature (including the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot's consensus scheme for the diagnosis of diabetic foot OM) and meta-analyses have proposed specific criteria for differentiation of CN from OM.…”
Section: Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scans can also be used to visualize non-tumoral bone and soft tissue disorders. This makes it a useful tool for the evaluation of orthopedic and rheumatologic diseases, allowing for more precise diagnosis and treatment planning (16). Furthermore, in neurologic medicine, PET/CT is a sophisticated technique that presents high spatial resolution and integrates functional data with morphological information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a large body of literature demonstrating that PET/MRI is equivalent to PET/CT for staging in many oncologic diseases [8,9] or has only moderate improvement. PET/MRI appears to contribute additional clinically relevant information in scenarios where the strengths of MRI outweigh the limitations of CT in PET/CT [10], for example in the staging of gynaecological cancers [11][12][13], brain neoplasms [14], head and neck cancers [15], soft tissue neoplasms [16] or urological cancers [17]. 18 F-FDG-PET/MRI however has shown to be equivocal or inferior to 18 F-FDG-PET/CT in other malignant disease such as lung cancer, where CT exceeds the morphologic capacities of MRI [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%