2019
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1ea4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Dark Energy Reconstruction Using the Tomographic Alcock–Paczynski Test

Abstract: The tomographic Alcock-Paczynski (AP) method can result in tight cosmological constraints by using small and intermediate clustering scales of the large scale structure (LSS) of the galaxy distribution. By focusing on the redshift dependence, the AP distortion can be distinguished from the distortions produced by the redshift space distortions (RSD). In this work, we combine the tomographic AP method with other recent observational datasets of SNIa+BAO+CMB+H 0 to reconstruct the dark energy equation-of-state w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RSD and nonlinear corrections for models far beyond the concordance ΛCDM can be very non-trivial. We leave the PAge exploration of BAO, as well as of many other potential probes (Wei et al 2017;Zheng et al 2019;Zhang et al 2019;Wong et al 2019;Shajib et al 2019), as our future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RSD and nonlinear corrections for models far beyond the concordance ΛCDM can be very non-trivial. We leave the PAge exploration of BAO, as well as of many other potential probes (Wei et al 2017;Zheng et al 2019;Zhang et al 2019;Wong et al 2019;Shajib et al 2019), as our future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of shot noise fundamentally restricts our ability to reconstruct the density field from the galaxy point distribution, as we must smooth on scales of at least the mean galaxy separation Kim et al (2014); Blake et al (2014); Appleby et al (2017). In contrast, methods such as the Alcock-Paczynski (AP) test Li et al (2016) (see also Li et al (2017); Zhang et al (2019a); Li et al (2018); Park et al (2019); Zhang et al (2019b)) employ information from very small scales, eliminating non-perturbative, non-linear systematics using simulations. In addition, the AP test does not require the application of mass cuts to generate uniform data samples with redshift, as we are forced to.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, H 0 measurements from the time delay of strongly lensed quasars support a higher value (Birrer et al 2019;Wong et al 2019); using differential age method with cosmic chronometers (Jimenez & Loeb 2002) provides an estimate in the middle of two results in tension (Jimenez et al 2019;Chen et al 2017;Luković et al 2016); while the constraints coming from gravitational waves are still fairly weak (Liao et al 2017). Although the quality of BAO data has substantially improved over the last decade, providing some of the most stringent cosmological constraints on expansion dynamics (Haridasu et al 2018a;Ramanah et al 2019;Zhang et al 2019), their H 0 estimate is degenerated with the sound horizon parameter, whose value relies on CMB obser-vations and early Universe physics (Macaulay et al 2019;Lemos et al 2019;Aubourg et al 2015;Cuceu et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%