2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric errors in variables models with measurement errors on both sides of the equation

Abstract: Measurement errors are often correlated, as in surveys where respondent's biases or tendencies to err affect multiple reported variables. We extend Schennach (2007) to identify moments of the conditional distribution of a true Y given a true X when both are measured with error, the measurement errors in Y and X are correlated, and the true unknown model of Y given X has nonseparable model errors. We also provide a nonparametric sieve estimator of the model, and apply it to nonparametric Engel curve estimation.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instruments are widely used in economic applications and can be seen as special cases of indicators, often exhibiting bias or Berkson errors (Newey (2001), Schennach (2004b), Schennach (2007a), Wang and Hsiao (2011), Nadai and Lewbel (2016)) Time series (   ) and panel data (  ) often naturally provide either repeated measurements, instruments or more general indicators (Griliches and Hausman (1986), Hausman and Taylor (1981), Evdokimov (2009), Horowitz and Markatou (1996), Wilhelm (2015), Evdokimov and Zeleneev (2020a)).…”
Section: Nonclassical Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instruments are widely used in economic applications and can be seen as special cases of indicators, often exhibiting bias or Berkson errors (Newey (2001), Schennach (2004b), Schennach (2007a), Wang and Hsiao (2011), Nadai and Lewbel (2016)) Time series (   ) and panel data (  ) often naturally provide either repeated measurements, instruments or more general indicators (Griliches and Hausman (1986), Hausman and Taylor (1981), Evdokimov (2009), Horowitz and Markatou (1996), Wilhelm (2015), Evdokimov and Zeleneev (2020a)).…”
Section: Nonclassical Measurement Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As conditional expectations are not necessarily integrable, their Fourier transform need to be interpreted as generalized functions (Lighthill (1962), Schwartz (1966), Temple (1963)). Nadai and Lewbel (2016) have extended this approach by (i) allowing for some forms of correlations between the errors in  and , (ii) considering multiplicative errors and (iii) providing identification results for polynomial moments of  .…”
Section: Kotlarski-type Identitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When total expenditure is combined with caloric intake or availability in a regression model this may lead to the common measurement error problem, which arises if total expenditure and caloric intake are derived from the same data source and as a result measurement error in one could correlate with measurement error in the other. This phenomenon is likely to occur in survey data where tendencies for error affect series of selfreported variables (De Nadai and Lewbel, 2016). Bouis and Haddad (1992) were the first to indicate that the common measurement error leads to a positive bias in estimated calorieincome elasticities.…”
Section: Measurement Error and Endogeneitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…see Hausman, Abrevaya, and Scott-Morton (1998); Lewbel (2000) and Meyer and Mittag (2017) for binary choice models, Hsiao and Sun (1998) for multinomial models, Abrevaya and Hausman (1999) for duration models and Li, Trivedi, and Guo (2003) for count models. In the continuous setting, Lewbel (1996); De Nadai and Lewbel (2016) investigate the measurement errors on both sides of regression. Unlike in the linear models where measurement errors on the left hand side cause only efficiency loss, there is sizable distortion of econometric analysis of nonlinear models with measurement errors on the dependent variable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%