2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2012.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric estimation of density under bias and multiplicative censoring via wavelet methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For (4), by (2), yf Y (y) tends to 0 as both y tends to +∞ and −∞. By (3), EY 2 (t (Y )) 2 is finite.…”
Section: Proof Of Equationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For (4), by (2), yf Y (y) tends to 0 as both y tends to +∞ and −∞. By (3), EY 2 (t (Y )) 2 is finite.…”
Section: Proof Of Equationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They obtain rates comparable to ours though on different regularity spaces, however their procedure is not adaptive and depends on the choice of a cutoff which is only empirically studied. Later on, wavelet methods have been applied by Abbaszadeh et al (2012Abbaszadeh et al ( ,2013 to estimate the density and its derivatives, considering a general L p -risk, and in presence of additional bias. Their estimators are adaptive and reach the same rates as ours up to logarithmic terms (when p = 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inverse problems considered here are the following ones. First, we assume that observations are (1) Y i = X i U i , i = 1, . .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vardi (1989)). Numerous papers deal with the estimation of f for model (1) whether by nonparametric maximum likelihood (Vardi (1989), Vardi and Zhang (1992), Asgharian et al (2012)), by projection methods (Andersen and Hansen (2001), Abbaszadeh et al (2012Abbaszadeh et al ( ,2013) or kernel methods (Brunel et al (2015)). In Belomestny et al (2016), f is supposed to be R + -supported and estimated by projection estimators on a Laguerre basis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%