2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2012.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric estimation of quantile density function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…in the kernel quantile density estimators. The Epanechnikov kernel, which gives the optimal kernel, see Prakasa Rao [34], was studied by Soni [23] for comparing non-parametric quantile density estimators and our simulation showed that Q(u) estimation behaviors under Epanechnikov kernel and triangular kernel were quite close, which was also confirmed in the study of Soni [23]. For simplicity, only the result of the Epanechnikov kernel was presented here.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…in the kernel quantile density estimators. The Epanechnikov kernel, which gives the optimal kernel, see Prakasa Rao [34], was studied by Soni [23] for comparing non-parametric quantile density estimators and our simulation showed that Q(u) estimation behaviors under Epanechnikov kernel and triangular kernel were quite close, which was also confirmed in the study of Soni [23]. For simplicity, only the result of the Epanechnikov kernel was presented here.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…These matches with our finding in simulation study that KPL Q and M Q can be away from the true quantile function for large values of u when data is heavily censored. Some techniques for correction at tails have already been explored and a brief review can be found in Soni et al [23]. In addition, as we found in the simulation study, Ĉ q performs the best among all quantile density estimators.…”
Section: Applicationsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is indeed being done at the moment, see Gámiz-Pérez et al (2013a,b,c) for the introduction of do-validation to three fundamental models of survival analysis. Do-validation could be considered in other smoothing problems, see for example Soni et al (2012), Oliveira et al (2012), Spreeuw et al (2013), Lee et al (2010Lee et al ( , 2012a, Buch-Kromann and Nielsen (2012), González-Manteiga et al (2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%