2020
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201800323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric estimation of the cumulative incidences of competing risks under double truncation

Abstract: Registry data typically report incident cases within a certain calendar time interval. Such interval sampling induces double truncation on the incidence times, which may result in an observational bias. In this paper, we introduce nonparametric estimation for the cumulative incidences of competing risks when the incidence time is doubly truncated. Two different estimators are proposed depending on whether the truncation limits are independent of the competing events or not. The asymptotic properties of the est… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be specific, the performance of the Pearson correlation coefficient, the weighted least squares estimator for the linear regression model, and the cumulative incidence functions for competing risks are investigated. See Mandel et al [14] for simulations of Cox regression with a doubly truncated response, and de Uña-Álvarez [5] for more on competing risks under double truncation.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be specific, the performance of the Pearson correlation coefficient, the weighted least squares estimator for the linear regression model, and the cumulative incidence functions for competing risks are investigated. See Mandel et al [14] for simulations of Cox regression with a doubly truncated response, and de Uña-Álvarez [5] for more on competing risks under double truncation.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interest in the random double truncation model has rapidly increased in the last years. Recent methods to handle doubly truncated outcomes include, among other topics, smoothing methods, 19,20 proportional hazards regression, 14,21 rank regression for linear models, 22 competing risks, 23 two-sample problems, 24 the estimation of a bivariate distribution, 2,25,26 or maximum likelihood theory for parametric models. 27,28 Formally testing for an ignorable sampling bias is important in all these settings with double truncation because, when there is no sampling bias, ordinary methods apply and the estimation variance can be reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%