2013
DOI: 10.1080/12294659.2013.10805263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonprofits and Accreditation: Exploring the Implications for Accountability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many respondents emphasized the need for "easy-to-use" resources because time constraints make it difficult to engage in this work. This parallels findings that have shown that time limitations are an obstacle to participation in nonprofit accreditation programs (e.g., Carman & Fredericks, 2013). Types of easy-to-use resources identified were checklists, scorecards, or benchmarking materials that provide "something concrete that nonprofits can rely on to assess where they are" or could "dashboard what an ethical organization looks like.…”
Section: Interview Findingssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many respondents emphasized the need for "easy-to-use" resources because time constraints make it difficult to engage in this work. This parallels findings that have shown that time limitations are an obstacle to participation in nonprofit accreditation programs (e.g., Carman & Fredericks, 2013). Types of easy-to-use resources identified were checklists, scorecards, or benchmarking materials that provide "something concrete that nonprofits can rely on to assess where they are" or could "dashboard what an ethical organization looks like.…”
Section: Interview Findingssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Possible explanations include the fact that larger organizations are under a higher level of scrutiny, and at the same time, have greater resources for professional management and training (Blodgett & Melconian, 2012). With regard to accreditation programs, organizations participating in accreditation use both the preparation process and the resulting recommendations to influence change (Carman & Fredericks, 2013;Lee, 2014). Accreditation can also help to "justify changes for further improvements and professionalization" (Lee, 2014, p. 411).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, private (or third party) accreditation has been described as less costly than government oversight, as well as more flexible and responsive to change (Institute of Medicine, 2001). Accreditation also can benefit organizations as a way to "respond to accountability demands" (Lee, McMillen, Knudsen, & Woods, 2007, p. 52), and a tool for managers to develop performance-monitoring processes (Carman & Fredericks, 2013). These (or similar) benefits to organizations are described in the limited research on accreditation in the social and human services sector (Slatten, Guidry, & Austin, 2011;Carman & Fredericks, 2013).…”
Section: Current Literature On Accreditation In Social/human Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relatively little is known about the impact of an accreditation process on the internal operations and outcomes of a nonprofit organization (Carman & Fredericks, ; Hunter, ). There is some evidence that the completion of accreditation, like obtaining other external “credentials” in various forms, can increase donor and funder confidence (Bekkers, ; Feng, Neely, & Slatten, ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%