2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.104.023901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonquantum Entanglement Resolves a Basic Issue in Polarization Optics

Abstract: The issue raised in this Letter is classical, not only in the sense of being nonquantum, but also in the sense of being quite ancient: which subset of 4x4 real matrices should be accepted as physical Mueller matrices in polarization optics? Nonquantum entanglement or inseparability between the polarization and spatial degrees of freedom of an electromagnetic beam whose polarization is not homogeneous is shown to provide the physical basis to resolve this issue in a definitive manner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
131
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
131
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intriguingly, also in classical optics there are field configurations which cannot be described as a tensor product of definite modes of each individual degree of freedom of the system [4]. These non-separable structures display a classical analogue of quantum entanglement [5][6][7][8]. One example are vector vortex beams, which are non-separable superpositions of transverse modes and polarization states of a laser beam [9][10][11].…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intriguingly, also in classical optics there are field configurations which cannot be described as a tensor product of definite modes of each individual degree of freedom of the system [4]. These non-separable structures display a classical analogue of quantum entanglement [5][6][7][8]. One example are vector vortex beams, which are non-separable superpositions of transverse modes and polarization states of a laser beam [9][10][11].…”
Section: Pacs Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHSH inequality can also be violated when considering intrabeam correlations between different degrees of freedom of intense beams, coherent or not [21]. This, sometimes referred to as nonquantum entanglement, or inseparability of degrees of freedom, has been considered [22,23] as a tool to shed new light into certain characteristics of classical fields, by applying techniques usually restricted to a quantum scenario.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We highlight the applicability of one and the same formalism both to the classical and quantum optical realms, obtaining parallel and consistent results in both of them [18,[53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%