2017
DOI: 10.2140/apde.2017.10.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonradial type II blow up for the energy-supercritical semilinear heat equation

Abstract: Abstract. We consider the semilinear heat equation in large dimension d ≥ 11 ∂tu = ∆u + |u| p−1 u, p = 2q + 1, q ∈ N on a smooth bounded domain Ω ⊂ R d with Dirichlet boundary condition. In the supercritical rangewe prove the existence of a countable family (u ℓ ) ℓ∈N of solutions blowing-up at time T > 0 with type II blow up:. They concentrate the ground state Q being the only radially and decaying solution of ∆Q + Q p = 0:at some point x0 ∈ Ω. The result generalizes previous works on the existence of type II… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• p = p S (see [46], [12]); • p = (N + 1)/(N − 3) with N ≥ 7 (see [11]); • p ≥ p JL ; see [30], [29], [39], [47] in radial case and [6], [9] in nonradial case. We note that one cannot expect general conclusions regarding the blow-up of the critical L q norm for type II blow-up solutions, since there are examples of boundedness of the critical L q norm as stated above (cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• p = p S (see [46], [12]); • p = (N + 1)/(N − 3) with N ≥ 7 (see [11]); • p ≥ p JL ; see [30], [29], [39], [47] in radial case and [6], [9] in nonradial case. We note that one cannot expect general conclusions regarding the blow-up of the critical L q norm for type II blow-up solutions, since there are examples of boundedness of the critical L q norm as stated above (cf.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, for p > p S , radial type II blow-up solutions converge to the singular stationary solution c * |x| −2/(p−1) as t tends to T (see [35]), and this implies unboundedness of L q * norm. As for the nonradial solutions in [6], [9], [11], the unboundedness of L q * norm can be directly seen by simple computations, using the asymptotic form of the solution obtained in those works.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us also mention that if p = p S , 3 ≤ n ≤ 6, and we allow sign-changing solution, then the blow-up may be of type II : This is indicated by formal arguments in [12] and proved in [30,7,8,9,17,18]. Type II blow-up can also occur for positive radial and non-radial solutions if n ≥ 11 and p ≥ p JL , where p JL := 1 + 4 n−4+2 √ n−1 (n−2)(n−10) (see [19,20,3,4,31]). In the case of smooth domains and Dirichlet boundary conditions, Theorem 1 implies the following theorem (cf.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formal result was clarified in [37], [35] and [9]. The collection of these works yields a complete classification of the type II blowup scenario for the radially symmetric energy supercritical case.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%