2012
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/758/2/89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonresonant Interaction of Charged Energetic Particles With Low-Frequency Noncompressive Turbulence: Numerical Simulation

Abstract: A new method for simulating the three-dimensional dynamics of charged energetic particles in very broadband noncompressive magnetic turbulence is introduced. All scales within the primary inertial range of the turbulence observed in the solar wind near 1 AU are now included for the independent computations of both the particle dynamics and the turbulent magnetic field lines (MFLs). While previous theories of resonant particle pitch-angle (PA) scattering and transport in interplanetary magnetic fields had favor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the dropout events likely originate from small localized regions on the Sun. Other interpretations of the impulsive-SEP-dropout phenomena invoke: (1) temporary trapping of particles within small-scale structures followed by rapid magnetic-field line diffusion (e.g., Ruffolo et al 2003;Chuychai et al 2007); (2) interplanetary turbulence that allows the magnetic-field lines to meander and spread out independently of supergranulation (Ragot 2012;Laitinen et al 2013b); (3) stochastic nature of the time-varying magnetic connectivity to the source regions in the presence of magnetic turbulence (Ruffolo and Matthaeus 2015). Chollet et al (2009) used the Giacalone et al (2000a) interpretation, along with in-situ observations of electrons and ions, to infer the source locations (longitude and latitude in the solar atmosphere) of impulsive SEP events.…”
Section: Flux Dropoutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that the dropout events likely originate from small localized regions on the Sun. Other interpretations of the impulsive-SEP-dropout phenomena invoke: (1) temporary trapping of particles within small-scale structures followed by rapid magnetic-field line diffusion (e.g., Ruffolo et al 2003;Chuychai et al 2007); (2) interplanetary turbulence that allows the magnetic-field lines to meander and spread out independently of supergranulation (Ragot 2012;Laitinen et al 2013b); (3) stochastic nature of the time-varying magnetic connectivity to the source regions in the presence of magnetic turbulence (Ruffolo and Matthaeus 2015). Chollet et al (2009) used the Giacalone et al (2000a) interpretation, along with in-situ observations of electrons and ions, to infer the source locations (longitude and latitude in the solar atmosphere) of impulsive SEP events.…”
Section: Flux Dropoutsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated by the green lines showing the mean ρ-spread (minus ρ 0 ) of MFLs initially separated from L 0 by ρ 0 = 10 7 , 10 8 , 10 9 , 10 10 , and 10 11 cm, it would remain small for any injection distance shorter than 10 11 cm (still by a factor of 3 or 4 for 10 11 cm because more distant MFLs separate more slowly; R09). Three-dimensional views of this and higherenergy electron trajectories and local MFLs can be seen in Ragot (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early works [ Dessler and Karplus , ; McIlwain , ], outward adiabatic transport was proposed to explain the electron flux dropout during geomagnetic storms (with the buildup of magnetospheric ring current) [ Kim and Chan , ; Su et al , ]. Recently, some nonadiabatic loss processes have been identified, such as magnetopause shadowing [ Li et al , ; Desorgher et al , ] and various wave‐particle resonant [ Horne and Thorne , ; Summers et al , ; Green et al , ; Thorne , ; Elkington et al , ; Shprits et al , ; Loto'Aniu et al , ; Su et al , ; Breneman et al , ; Zhu et al , ; Gao et al , ] and nonresonant [ Qin and Shalchi , ; Ragot , ; Lemons , ; Camporeale , ; Chen et al , ] interactions. These nonadiabatic mechanisms can act not only in storm times [e.g, Bortnik et al , ; Su et al , ; Turner et al , , ; Hudson et al , ] but also in nonstorm times [ Su et al , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%