2021
DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2021.1906803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonresponse bias in public leadership research: an empirical assessment

Abstract: Self-reported measures of leadership are widely used in public management research, but nonresponse bias poses a threat to the validity of these data. Although this measurement problem is acknowledged, it has received limited empirical attention because nonresponse bias is inherently challenging to study. To address this issue, we examine nonresponse bias among public managers by analyzing multilevel surveys of managers and employees in which we can compare employee ratings of leadership for both responding an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To strengthen this finding, we compared those who initially refused to participate in the study with those who never declined (Fulton, 2018). Again, we found no difference between the two groups, which can be concluded that nonresponse bias did not occur in our case (Vogel and Jacobsen, 2021).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 43%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To strengthen this finding, we compared those who initially refused to participate in the study with those who never declined (Fulton, 2018). Again, we found no difference between the two groups, which can be concluded that nonresponse bias did not occur in our case (Vogel and Jacobsen, 2021).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 43%
“…To strengthen this finding, we compared those who initially refused to participate in the study with those who never declined (Fulton, 2018). Again, we found no difference between the two groups, which can be concluded that nonresponse bias did not occur in our case (Vogel and Jacobsen, 2021). Furthermore, we examined common method variance (CMV), which often threatens the findings when the same respondent answers questions for a set of variables.…”
Section: Nonresponse Bias and Common Methods Variancementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The independent t -test was used to compare the mean of the two sub-samples. We found no difference ( p > 0.05) for all pairs between the two groups, meaning that there is no statistical evidence that the sample is significantly different from the rest of the population (Vogel and Jacobsen, 2021). Therefore, we conclude that non-response bias is not a threat to our results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Instead, we focus on the level of "meaning" (Alvesson and Sk€ oldberg 2018) which is useful and relevant when the interest is in people's constructions of leadership (Blom and Alvesson 2014). This choice of method complements the quantitative methods often adopted in studies on leadership in the public sector (Meier and O'Toole 2011;Vogel and Jacobsen 2021), and in doing so, also responds to calls for more qualitative in-depth studies (e.g., Andersen et al 2018;Orazi et al 2013).…”
Section: Research Setting and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%