2008
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2007.70752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonrigid Structure-from-Motion: Estimating Shape and Motion with Hierarchical Priors

Abstract: This paper describes methods for recovering time-varying shape and motion of non-rigid 3D objects from uncalibrated 2D point tracks. For example, given a video recording of a talking person, we would like to estimate the 3D shape of the face at each instant, and learn a model of facial deformation. Time-varying shape is modeled as a rigid transformation combined with a non-rigid deformation. Reconstruction is ill-posed if arbitrary deformations are allowed, and thus additional assumptions about deformations ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
590
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 438 publications
(592 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
590
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the physical signification of the orthogonal matrix R ∈ R D×D is obviously lost. The extension, which can be called nDRI-MP [37], modifies only the registration (steps [4][5], extending the definition of the inner variable…”
Section: The Resulting Complexity Is O(nlogn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this case, the physical signification of the orthogonal matrix R ∈ R D×D is obviously lost. The extension, which can be called nDRI-MP [37], modifies only the registration (steps [4][5], extending the definition of the inner variable…”
Section: The Resulting Complexity Is O(nlogn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shapes are decomposed on a shape basis, and this is a common way to analyze 3D data [2,3,4,5]. Recently, the duality between shape basis and trajectory basis has been shown by Akhter et al [6].…”
Section: The Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most standard approach to solve these ambiguities is using statistical priors to approximate the global deformable structure as a linear combination of low-rank bases of shapes (Brand 2001;Bregler et al 2000;Moreno-Noguer and Porta 2011;Torresani et al 2008), by means of a linear combination of 3D point trajectories (Akhter et al 2008;Park et al 2010;Valmadre and Lucey 2012), or even using a shapetrajectory combination (Gotardo and Martínez 2011b). This is typically used with additional smoothness constraints that further disambiguate the problem (Bartoli et al 2008;Garg et al 2013;Paladini et al 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%