1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00939906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonscalarized multiobjective global optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, k = 1; thus, l 1 = 1 and by (13) we have v * 1 = 1. Dropping the subscript, we get from (20)…”
Section: Optimal Lagrangian and Sensitivity Of The Balance Setmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this case, k = 1; thus, l 1 = 1 and by (13) we have v * 1 = 1. Dropping the subscript, we get from (20)…”
Section: Optimal Lagrangian and Sensitivity Of The Balance Setmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In this way, we can present satisfactoriness and the preferred solution from the perspective of singular-level multi-objective decision-making problems. We now introduce several theorems [7,9,12] with the help of the quality of balance space approach to provide a theoretical basis for the first-level, second-level, and third-level multi-objective decision-making problems.…”
Section: Definitions and Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. ; a m Þ be the vector of partial global solutions, and let X 0 i ðgÞ ¼ fx 2 X jf i ðxÞ À a i 6 gg be the g-suboptimal solution sets, then we have the following definitions [9,12]:…”
Section: Definitions and Theoremsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations