1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02066659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonstandard KP evolution and the quantumτ-function

Abstract: One possible way to fix partly a "canonical definition" of τ -functions beyond the conventional KP/Toda framework could be to postulate that evolution operators are always group elements. We discuss implications of this postulate for the first non-trivial case: fundamental representations of quantum groups SL q (N ). It appears that the most suited (simple) for quantum deformation framework is some non-standard formulation of KP/Toda systems. It turns out that the postulate needs to be slightly modified to tak… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If at all resolvable this is the problem of a clever choice of the weight functions s R m,m (t,t) in (5.1). Following [56] we shall now demonstrate that the problem is resolvable in principle, though at the moment it is a quantum deformation of somewhat non-conventional description of KP/Toda system (with evolution, introduced differently from that in s.5.2, and it is not just a change of time-variables: the transformation is representation R-dependent).…”
Section: Comments On the Quantum Deformation Of Kp/toda τ -Functionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If at all resolvable this is the problem of a clever choice of the weight functions s R m,m (t,t) in (5.1). Following [56] we shall now demonstrate that the problem is resolvable in principle, though at the moment it is a quantum deformation of somewhat non-conventional description of KP/Toda system (with evolution, introduced differently from that in s.5.2, and it is not just a change of time-variables: the transformation is representation R-dependent).…”
Section: Comments On the Quantum Deformation Of Kp/toda τ -Functionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Now it remains to recall the basic relation between the infinitesimal norm and the measure: 53) provided c N in (2.1) and (2.46) is chosen to be 54) where the volume of unitary group in Haar measure is equal to 56) where…”
Section: -Matrix Model In Eigenvalue Representationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…does not satisfy criteria (4.2) and (4.4) as a function of any time or time pairs, see [7,8] for a detailed consideration (it is not even clear if it fits into the wide class of the non-Abelian τ -functions of [73][74][75][76]). Notable exceptions are the cases when k = 1, 2 and when β ∆ are adjusted to provide any linear combination of the standard Casimir operators (3.4), which are nicknamed as complete cycles in [77,78].…”
Section: Representation Via Casimir Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncompactified D = 11 Mtheory was found to have an equivalence with the N = ∞ limit of supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics describing D 0 branes. Matrix models of 2D gravity and Toda theory have been discussed by Gerasimov et al [105] and by Kharchev et al [103].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%