1996
DOI: 10.1016/0024-3795(95)00583-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonstationary parallel relaxed multisplitting methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. , K in Theorem 3.1, it reduces to Theorem 3.1 in [10]; If ω 1 = ω 2 = · · · = ω K and ω = 1 in Theorem 3.2, it reduces to theorem 3.4 in [11]; If ω k = 1 for all k = 1, 2, . .…”
Section: Remark 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , K in Theorem 3.1, it reduces to Theorem 3.1 in [10]; If ω 1 = ω 2 = · · · = ω K and ω = 1 in Theorem 3.2, it reduces to theorem 3.4 in [11]; If ω k = 1 for all k = 1, 2, . .…”
Section: Remark 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of multisplittings, first introduced in [34], provides a very general setting to study parallel block methods; see, e.g., [2], [3], [4], [13], [17], [19], [21], [28], [31], [39]. This general setting encompasses cases, e.g., where there is overlap, i.e., where more than one processor computes approximations to the same variable, and the weighting matrices E have positive entries smaller than 1, see e.g., [22], [29].…”
Section: Algorithm 2 (Nonlinear Two-stage Multisplitting)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asynchronous methods have the potential of converging much faster than synchronous methods, especially when there is load imbalance, e.g., when one of the systems (2) takes much longer to solve than all the others; see e.g., [13], [24], [27], [31]. A block asynchronous method for the solution of (1) was analyzed in [9] using a different approach, and without considering the two-stage case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of ω = 1 we have a Relaxed Non-stationary Multisplitting Algorithm (Algorithm 3). The convergence of algorithms 2 and 3 when A is an H-matrix was studied by Mas, Migallón, Penadés and Szyld [20]. Furthermore, in [20] the authors report computational results of those algorithms on a multiprocessor system that show a better behavior of the non-stationary models than the stationary ones (Algorithm 1).…”
Section: Algorithm 2 (Non-stationary Multisplitting)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convergence of algorithms 2 and 3 when A is an H-matrix was studied by Mas, Migallón, Penadés and Szyld [20]. Furthermore, in [20] the authors report computational results of those algorithms on a multiprocessor system that show a better behavior of the non-stationary models than the stationary ones (Algorithm 1). For a background on parallel non-stationary models see also [5], [6], [7], [13], [14] or [15].…”
Section: Algorithm 2 (Non-stationary Multisplitting)mentioning
confidence: 99%