Sr2FeMoO6-δ (SFMO) double perovskite is a promising candidate for room-temperature spintronic applications, since it possesses a half-metallic character (with theoretically 100% spin polarization), a high Curie temperature of about 415 K and a low-field magnetoresistance (LFMR). The magnetic, resistive and catalytic properties of the double perovskite SFMO are excellent for spintronic (non-volatile memory), sensing, fuel cell and microwave absorber applications. However, due to different synthesis conditions of ceramics and thin films, different mechanisms of electrical conductivity and magnetoresistance prevail. In this work, we consider the occurrence of a weak localization effect in SFMO commonly obtained in disordered metallic or semiconducting systems at very low temperatures due to quantum interference of backscattered electrons. We calculate the quantum corrections to conductivity and the contribution of electron scattering to the resistivity of SFMO. We attribute the temperature dependence of SFMO ceramic resistivity in the absence of a magnetic field to the fluctuation-induced tunneling model. We also attribute the decreasing resistivity in the temperature range from 409 K to 590 K to adiabatic small polaron hopping and not to localization effects. Neither fluctuation-induced tunneling nor adiabatic small polaron hopping favors quantum interference. Additionally, we demonstrate that the resistivity upturn behavior of SFMO cannot be explained by weak localization. Here, the fitted model parameters have no physically meaningful values, i.e., the fitted weak localization coefficient (B′) was three orders of magnitude lower than the theoretical coefficient, while the fitted exponent (n) of the electron–electron interaction term (CnTn) could not be assigned to a specific electron-scattering mechanism. Consequently, to the best of our knowledge, there is still no convincing evidence for the presence of weak localization in SFMO.