2014
DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2014176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonsurgical faecal diversion in the management of severe perianal sepsis: a retrospective evaluation of the flexible faecal management system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from the fact that FG commonly develops in immunocompromised patients with comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus and malignancy [4,13], even for immunocompetent patients, immune functions may be greatly reduced under stress; thus, the normal microflora of the human gut or skin, such as A. turicensis, may transform into pathogens. For patients without sphincter injury, not using surgical faecal diversion not only avoid wound contamination [14] but also can improve the prognosis of FG [15] as well as the patients' long-term quality of life. In this case, based on the necrotic extent of the patient's perineum (with an intact anal sphincter and without defecation problems) and his preference, we chose NPWT instead of a preventive colostomy before skin grafting to accelerate the preparation of the wound bed without faecal contamination, and a clinical outcome was achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the fact that FG commonly develops in immunocompromised patients with comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus and malignancy [4,13], even for immunocompetent patients, immune functions may be greatly reduced under stress; thus, the normal microflora of the human gut or skin, such as A. turicensis, may transform into pathogens. For patients without sphincter injury, not using surgical faecal diversion not only avoid wound contamination [14] but also can improve the prognosis of FG [15] as well as the patients' long-term quality of life. In this case, based on the necrotic extent of the patient's perineum (with an intact anal sphincter and without defecation problems) and his preference, we chose NPWT instead of a preventive colostomy before skin grafting to accelerate the preparation of the wound bed without faecal contamination, and a clinical outcome was achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 20 Recently, the Flexi-Seal Fecal Management System (ConvaTec, Inc., Skillman, N.J.) has been reported to be suitable for short-term fecal diversion to prevent the fecal contamination of perineum wounds; this system is an alternative treatment choice to colostomy and avoids additional operation or colostomy complications. 21 23 Eleven of our patients underwent colostomy due to the severity of Fournier gangrene and extensive perineum involvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past few decades, many papers have discussed non-surgical faecal diversion methods such as Foley catheter attachment to the anus, rectal tube insertion, creation of faecal pouch, and stool management systems with or without balloons [1][2][3][4][5][6]. It has been shown that non-surgical faecal diverting systems have reduced the patient's duration of hospital stay, additional surgery requirements, and rate of complications [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wound management around the perineal region is always a challenging task due to high risk of faecal contamination. Perineal wounds are commonly caused by severe infections such as necrotising fasciitis and Fournier's gangrene; pressure ulcers from long term immobilised patients; or burns [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The risk of infection due to faecal contamination can result in sepsis, graft failure, delayed wound healing or scar complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation