“…The lack of authentic reference standards for most PFASs makes it a great challenge to identify PFASs, particularly emerging/new species. However, nontarget analysis has been proven to be a feasible and reliable alternative measure to screen and identify pollutants, thus mitigating the predicament caused by lack of authentic reference standards. , Advanced chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry technologies, such as liquid chromatography-quadrupole-Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS), − liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QTOF-MS), , gas chromatography-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS, , gas chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry, and Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry, , have been applied to nontarget analysis of various environmental pollutants. , Many nontarget analysis approaches have been recently developed for screening and identifying PFASs, with more than 1000 PFASs identified in various matrices, including commercial products, ,, environmental media, , and biological samples. , LC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS , and LC-QTOF-MS , operated in the data acquisition modes of full scan, , data-independent acquisition (DIA), and data-dependent acquisition (DDA) have been applied to nontarget analysis of PFASs. However, a more sophisticated strategy for DDA mode, namely, precursor ion exclusion (PIE), has not been reported to carry out nontarget analysis for PFASs, despite its successful application in identifying various other compounds. − By means of PIE, high-abundance precursor ions are excluded in a next repeated analysis, and therefore, more precursor ions with lower abundances can be triggered in DDA mode, as DDA can commonly generate MS/MS spectra for merely a limited number of precursor ions with the highest abundances (e.g., top five ions).…”