2009
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.79.095019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonuniversal gaugino masses from nonsingletF-terms in nonminimal unified models

Abstract: In phenomenological studies of low-energy supersymmetry, running gaugino masses are often taken to be equal near the scale of apparent gauge coupling unification. However, many known mechanisms can avoid this universality, even in models with unified gauge interactions. One example is an F -term vacuum expectation value that is a singlet under the Standard Model gauge group but transforms non-trivially in the symmetric product of two adjoint representations of a group that contains the Standard Model gauge gro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What is relevant for us is that this integral scales as the inverse of the mass squared of the heaviest particle propagating in the loop and it can be approximated by I(x, y, z) ≈ a/ max(x, y, z) with 1 Top-bottom-tau Yukawa unification in a model with µ < 0 and non-universal gaugino masses assumed to be generated by an F -term in 54-dimensional representation of SO(10) was investigated before in [12]. However, the gaugino mass relation used in that analysis was based on the results of [13] which are incorrect, as was pointed out recently in [6]. Moreover, the Higgs splitting in the model of [12] was introduced ad-hoc rather than by a D-term contribution.…”
Section: So(10) Yukawa Unification With Negative µmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is relevant for us is that this integral scales as the inverse of the mass squared of the heaviest particle propagating in the loop and it can be approximated by I(x, y, z) ≈ a/ max(x, y, z) with 1 Top-bottom-tau Yukawa unification in a model with µ < 0 and non-universal gaugino masses assumed to be generated by an F -term in 54-dimensional representation of SO(10) was investigated before in [12]. However, the gaugino mass relation used in that analysis was based on the results of [13] which are incorrect, as was pointed out recently in [6]. Moreover, the Higgs splitting in the model of [12] was introduced ad-hoc rather than by a D-term contribution.…”
Section: So(10) Yukawa Unification With Negative µmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Second, we assume that the gaugino masses are generated by an F -term which is a nonsinglet of SO(10) transforming as 24-dimensional representation of SU(5) ⊃ SO (10). This assumption results in the following pattern of the gaugino masses: M 1 : M 2 : M 3 = −1 : −3 : 2 [6], which implies that the SUSY contribution to (g − 2) µ is positive, as preferred by the experimental data. We should stress here that even though the gaugino masses are non-universal, there is only one free parameter in this sector which sets the overall scale.…”
Section: Jhep08(2011)147mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, when µ ≪ M 1,2 , these processes are largely insensitive to other SUSY parameters but higgsino mass µ. Therefore, we do not consider the production of stops and gluino in this paper, which contribute to the fine-tuning in more complicated and model-dependent way [19][20][21][22]. The current constraints on the mass limits of stop and gluino in natural SUSY have been discussed in [28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Calculations and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1.1), µ and m Hu must be of the order of ∼ 100 − 200 GeV, which implies light higgsinos. At the same time, the electroweak gaugino mass parameters M 1,2 are preferred to be of the similar order as the heavy gluino mass parameter M 3 and large Higgs-stop trilinear coupling A t is JHEP02(2014)049 needed [19][20][21][22]. Hence, generically we have µ ≪ M 1,2 and the mass splittings between the lightest chargino and the lightest two neutralinos at leading order are determined by [27] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This happens because µ 2 is related to m 2 hu and m 2 h d through the electroweak symmetry breaking condition eq. GUT models (denoted by circles, squares and diamonds respectively) considered in [57]. GUT models with F terms in 75 or 200 of SU (5), in 210 or 770 of SO (10) and in the corresponding representations of "flipped SO(10)" embedded in E 6 predict gaugino mass ratios in the intermediate and low fine tuning region.…”
Section: The Gaugino Focus Point -Analytic Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%