2021
DOI: 10.1111/ijd.15661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonuremic calciphylaxis in a COVID‐19 patient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous reports of uremic-associated disease describe its development within a month following COVID-19 diagnosis. 5,11,13 In our case, the manifestations of calciphylaxis began much later, presenting 3 months after infection and 2 months after recovery of renal function and discontinuation of warfarin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous reports of uremic-associated disease describe its development within a month following COVID-19 diagnosis. 5,11,13 In our case, the manifestations of calciphylaxis began much later, presenting 3 months after infection and 2 months after recovery of renal function and discontinuation of warfarin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…To the authors' knowledge, this is only the second reported case of non-uremic calciphylaxis following COVID-19. 5 The pathogenesis of calciphylaxis is thought to be multifactorial, involving an imbalance of calcium and phosphate levels that results in the formation and deposition of calciumphosphate crystals contributing to chronically narrowed vessels. 2 Traditionally, calciphylaxis occurs in the setting of renal failure, which disrupts the normal concentrations of these electrolytes due to decreased renal phosphate excretion and secondary hyperparathyroidism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 7 The mechanism of calciphylaxis in COVID-19 infection remains unconfirmed, but one hypothesis could be related to platelet aggregation and persistent complement activation leading to vasculopathy. 8 A prothrombotic state, as seen in COVID-19, has been hypothesized to be necessary to create the opportunity for calciphylaxis in conjunction with a hyperinflammatory state. 5 , 9 However, mechanisms for calcium deposition can only be speculative to date and may more likely be a combination of vasculopathy, hypercoagulopathy, and calcium deposition due to multifactorial effects that include key factors, such as nuclear factor κ-B, endothelin-1, and other cytokines influenced by this hyperinflammatory MIS-C state, in addition to other previously identified etiologic risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This hypercoagulable state may increase the risk of more common thrombotic complications, including pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and stroke [6]. Cases of a more rare complication, NUC, have also been reported in the setting of COVID-19 [9][10][11]. Current literature suggests a "two-hit" mechanism wherein a patient may have an asymptomatic or subclinical hypercoagulable condition that, when combined with a prothrombotic state in the setting of severe COVID-19 infection, predisposes patients to rare complications such as calciphylaxis [9,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%