Nonusage Attrition of Adolescents in an mHealth Promotion Intervention and the Role of Socioeconomic Status: Secondary Analysis of a 2-Arm Cluster-Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may help adolescents adopt healthy lifestyles. However, attrition in these interventions is high. Overall, there is a lack of research on nonusage attrition in adolescents, particularly regarding the role of socioeconomic status (SES). Objective The aim of this study was to focus on the role of SES in the following three research questions (RQs): When do adolescents stop using an mHealth intervention (RQ1)? Why do they report nonusage attrition (RQ2)? Which intervention components (ie, self-regulation component, narrative, and chatbot) prevent nonusage attrition among adolescents (RQ3)? Methods A total of 186 Flemish adolescents (aged 12-15 years) participated in a 12-week mHealth program. Log data were monitored to measure nonusage attrition and usage duration for the 3 intervention components. A web-based questionnaire was administered to assess reasons for attrition. A survival analysis was conducted to estimate the time to attrition and determine whether this differed according to SES (RQ1). Descriptive statistics were performed to map the attrition reasons, and Fisher exact tests were used to determine if these reasons differed depending on the educational track (RQ2). Mixed effects Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate the associations between the use duration of the 3 components during the first week and attrition. An interaction term was added to the regression models to determine whether associations differed by the educational track (RQ3). Results After 12 weeks, 95.7% (178/186) of the participants stopped using the app. 30.1% (56/186) of the adolescents only opened the app on the installation day, and 44.1% (82/186) stopped using the app in the first week. Attrition at any given time during the intervention period was higher for adolescents from the nonacademic educational track compared with those from the academic track. The other SES indicators (family affluence and perceived financial situation) did not explain attrition. The most common reasons for nonusage attrition among participants were perceiving that the app did not lead to behavior change, not liking the app, thinking that they already had a sufficiently healthy lifestyle, using other apps, and not being motivated by the environment. Attrition reasons did not differ depending on the educational track. More time spent in the self-regulation and narrative components during the first week was associated with lower attrition, whereas chatbot use duration was not associated with attrition rates. No moderating effects of SES were observed in the latter association. Conclusions Nonusage attrition was high, especially among adolescents in the nonacademic educational track. The reported reasons for attrition were diverse, with no statistical differences according to the educational level. The duration of the use of the self-regulation and narrative components during the first week may prevent attrition for both educational tracks. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04719858; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04719858

Computer Vision Estimation of Stress and Anxiety Using a Gamified Mobile-based Ecological Momentary Assessment and Deep Learning: Research Protocol

“…Incorporating reminders has been shown to increase engagement levels in mental healthcare research, making it more effective than interventions without this feature [46][47][48]. Using reminders in digital health interventions can also lead to higher levels of adherence to the research and lower non-usage attrition, which are common issues with online-based interventions [49][50][51]. Non-usage attrition refers to participants who stop using the digital intervention while still participating in the research through other protocols, such as filling out questionnaires.…”

A mobile healthy lifestyle intervention to promote mental health in adolescence: a mixed-methods evaluation

“…Only 26 users (17.33%) reported having watched three or more of the twelve episodes of the narrative. Attrition rates of this study are discussed in more detail elsewhere [ 66 ]. Median in-app duration was 19 (MAD 15) minutes.…”

Usage and Daily Attrition of a Smartphone-Based Health Behavior Intervention: Randomized Controlled Trial

“…Physical inactivity and inadequate nutritional habits are often interrelated to disabling emotional problems, and integrated strategies should include all 3 pillars to improve physical as well as mental well-being in adolescent populations. mHealth interventions targeting disabling emotional problems in adolescent populations have revealed encouraging outcomes, despite the fact that attrition rates in these interventions are generally high [ 11 , 25 - 30 ]. Varying definitions of attrition have complicated research on this topic, but attrition is defined as leaving treatment before obtaining a required level of improvement or completing intervention goals [ 31 - 33 ].…”

“…Varying definitions of attrition have complicated research on this topic, but attrition is defined as leaving treatment before obtaining a required level of improvement or completing intervention goals [ 31 - 33 ]. Research on mental mHealth interventions among adolescents has frequently lacked detailed time-related attrition data alongside accurate definitions and analysis of attrition reasons, though recent studies show promise in that regard [ 11 , 30 , 34 ]. Attrition is regularly reported at 2 distinct points of time, that is, intervention start and intervention end.…”