Handbook of Nonverbal Assessment 2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-0153-4_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonverbal Neuropsychological Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 72 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the state of the art and science of nonverbal assessment is stronger today than ever, controversies and problems still need to be resolved. Not all experts agree that nonverbal intelligence tests measure general intelligence, period, as opposed to some subconstruct called nonverbal intelligence, despite the literature showing limited support for a verbal-nonverbal ability dichotomy (e.g., Wasserman & Lawhorn, 2003). Others have evaluated the available data differently (e.g., Rourke, 2000), and there is no well-defined methodology to address this question (Braden & Athanasiou, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the state of the art and science of nonverbal assessment is stronger today than ever, controversies and problems still need to be resolved. Not all experts agree that nonverbal intelligence tests measure general intelligence, period, as opposed to some subconstruct called nonverbal intelligence, despite the literature showing limited support for a verbal-nonverbal ability dichotomy (e.g., Wasserman & Lawhorn, 2003). Others have evaluated the available data differently (e.g., Rourke, 2000), and there is no well-defined methodology to address this question (Braden & Athanasiou, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%