1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199701)53:1<35::aid-jclp5>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonverbal support giving induces nonverbal support seeking in depressed patients

Abstract: Nonverbal support seeking behavior of 11 mildly depressed patients was studied in relation to the nonverbal support giving behavior of a female interviewer. The patients were interviewed for 20 minutes during which the interviewer gave high and low nonverbal support for 10 minutes in a cross-over design. Different behavioral elements of the patients and of the interviewer were pooled into behavioral factors. Support seeking behavior (Speaking Effort) was significantly higher when high nonverbal support giving … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The adult may have been attempting to encourage the adolescent to show more of this behaviour or to be more supportive. The latter tendency was also found in psychiatrists' behaviour during interviews with severely versus less depressed adults (Geerts, Bouhuys, & Bloem, 1997). That the adult partner in the present study did not react this way in the younger group could mean that the difference in child behaviour may not have been so apparent there (frequency of backchannelling was low even in the nondepressed group) or was attributed a different meaning/importance because of their younger age.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The adult may have been attempting to encourage the adolescent to show more of this behaviour or to be more supportive. The latter tendency was also found in psychiatrists' behaviour during interviews with severely versus less depressed adults (Geerts, Bouhuys, & Bloem, 1997). That the adult partner in the present study did not react this way in the younger group could mean that the difference in child behaviour may not have been so apparent there (frequency of backchannelling was low even in the nondepressed group) or was attributed a different meaning/importance because of their younger age.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…For example, depression elicits negative peer responses, including social rejection of the depressed individual (Mullins, Peterson, Wonderlich, & Reaven, 1986). In addition, depressed individuals often fail to seek support directly (Geerts, Bouhuys, & Bloem, 1997). Creating and maintaining relationships is made difficult by depressive symptoms and the social responses they elicit.…”
Section: Relationship Layers and Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But more than the valence, it seems that it is the affiliative behaviors that are impacted, supporting a social withdrawal [38,39]. In fact, certain patterns of behavior when interacting with others may predict the severity of symptoms or treatment response [36,59,[80][81][82][83]. Finally, physiological measures are mainly lowered for both HRV (ie, HF, LF, VLF, and time domains) [66] and EDA (ie, SCR and SCL) [67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%