2018
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonverbal synchrony as a behavioural marker of patient and physician race-related attitudes and a predictor of outcomes in oncology interactions: protocol for a secondary analysis of video-recorded cancer treatment discussions

Abstract: IntroductionRacial disparities in cancer treatment contribute to racial disparities in mortality rates. The quality of patient–physician communication during clinical interactions with black patients and non-black physicians (racially discordant) is poorer than communication quality with white patients (racially concordant). Patient and physician race-related attitudes affect the quality of this communication. These attitudes are likely expressed through subtle non-verbal behaviours, but prior research has not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonverbal synchrony of facial expression and movement, although usually unintentional, builds rapport and trust and contributes to collaboration in solving problems. 22 Analysis and measurement of nonverbal communication in video-based interactions would be an area of interest for future research because it contributes to patient satisfaction and understanding of health issues, which, in turn, mediate adherence and other health outcomes. 23,24 To this end, automated video analysis methods are now under development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonverbal synchrony of facial expression and movement, although usually unintentional, builds rapport and trust and contributes to collaboration in solving problems. 22 Analysis and measurement of nonverbal communication in video-based interactions would be an area of interest for future research because it contributes to patient satisfaction and understanding of health issues, which, in turn, mediate adherence and other health outcomes. 23,24 To this end, automated video analysis methods are now under development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Questions remain regarding whether poor quality clinical communication is associated with patient race or the racial concordance/discordance of the patient–physician dyad 46 . However, most Black patients' clinical interactions are with physicians who are not Black (ie, racially discordant), due to a shortage of Black/African American physicians, and especially oncologists, 24 making this distinction difficult to study using naturally occurring clinical interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the dataset included mostly female patients with breast cancer who interacted with both male and female physicians, which prevented us from performing a meaningful comparison of the influence of patient sex on the findings. Future research should examine similar interactions with patients and providers from other backgrounds, 47 sexes, genders, and medical contexts. These limitations notwithstanding, this study marks a considerable step forward in understanding of the dynamic nature of nonverbal communication between Black patients and their oncologists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEPPI-10 is a questionnaire used to measure patient's perceived self-efficacy in interacting with physicians, and the impact of empowerment interventions (Maly et al 1998). Recently, study protocols for investigating physician communication behaviors (Hagiwara et al 2018) and behavioral markers of patient and physician race-related attitudes (Hamel et al 2018) have been published. The doctor-patient relationship is a key component in patient health outcomes (Whittal and Lippke 2016); yet, little is known about perceived self-efficacy in doctor-patient interactions (Raymond et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%