2006
DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2006/019)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonword Repetition and Sentence Repetition as Clinical Markers of Specific Language Impairment: The Case of Cantonese

Abstract: SR but not NWR discriminates between children with SLI and their TDAM peers. Poorer NWR for English-speaking children with SLI might be attributable to weaker use of the redintegration strategy in word repetition. Further cross-linguistic investigations of processing strategies are required.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
151
5
12

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
15
151
5
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, children's non-word repetition tasks have been created for a number of languages including Spanish (Girbau & Schwartz, 2007;Le Foll et al, 1995;Maridaki-Kassotaki, 2002;Paradis, 2001;Sahlén, Reuterskiöld-Wagner, Nettelbladt, & Radeborg, 1999;van Bon & van der Pijl, 1997;Stokes, Wong, Fletcher, & Leonard, 2006). Only several of these studies administered the task in specific language impaired children (the other ones analyzed other children's issues).…”
Section: Non-word Repetition Tasks In Other Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, children's non-word repetition tasks have been created for a number of languages including Spanish (Girbau & Schwartz, 2007;Le Foll et al, 1995;Maridaki-Kassotaki, 2002;Paradis, 2001;Sahlén, Reuterskiöld-Wagner, Nettelbladt, & Radeborg, 1999;van Bon & van der Pijl, 1997;Stokes, Wong, Fletcher, & Leonard, 2006). Only several of these studies administered the task in specific language impaired children (the other ones analyzed other children's issues).…”
Section: Non-word Repetition Tasks In Other Languagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, a second form of validity evidence focused on children's concurrent performance using scores from the Recalling Sentences subtest of the CELF-4. Given prior evidence that sentence repetition serves as a relatively sensitive marker of language impairment (e.g., Conti-Ramsden, Botting, & Faragher, 2001;Meir, Walters, & Armon-Lotem, 2015;Stokes, Wong, Fletcher, & Leonard, 2006), we selected participants from each home visit who scored at least 1 SD above or below the mean on this subtest at each time point and compared the two groups on their productive-language measures at the same home visit. Significant group differences emerged across all nine comparisons (3 productive language-sample measures × 3 home visits), with Cohen's d varying from −0.92 to −1.08 at HV5, from −0.47 to −0.70 at HV6, and from −0.90 to −0.96 at HV7.…”
Section: Preliminary Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The English sentence repetition task was designed to be an indicator specifically of English grammatical knowledge for DLLs [66]. Lower levels of English sentence repetition, however, have been identified as more closely related to general language skills [67,68], similar to RAN [16,19]. The results suggest that, at higher levels of English sentence repetition ability, children's scores are indicative of an underlying ability that differs from that measured by RAN.…”
Section: Relationship To Sentence Imitationmentioning
confidence: 59%