1997
DOI: 10.1006/jfan.1996.3004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norm Inequalities for Self-Adjoint Derivations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AX * B d * m as n-N: According to(17) an appeal to the lower semi-continuity of jj Á jj p proves Theorem 3.3 with * A; * B instead of A; B: In other words, we now have…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…AX * B d * m as n-N: According to(17) an appeal to the lower semi-continuity of jj Á jj p proves Theorem 3.3 with * A; * B instead of A; B: In other words, we now have…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It is the arithmetic-geometric-logarithmic (56),(74) and Young (66) inequalities that have been under especially intensive investigation and a very good account can be found in [2,6,16]. Power and other various natural mean operator inequalities are investigated in [18,20,21,16], perturbation and generalized derivations norm inequalities in [1,11,17], and different Cauchy-Schwarz inequalities in [9,18,19], with the numerous references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4,13]. For some other perturbation results the reader is referred to [10,12]. In this paper, we present some upper bounds for |||f (A)Xg(B) ± X|||, where A, B are G 1 operators, ||| · ||| is a unitarily invariant norm and f, g ∈ H. Further, we find some new upper bounds for the the Schatten 2-norm of f (A)X ± Xg(B).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…D and D s were investigated and approximated finite-dimension (AF )C * -algebra in that context and an example was given to show certain estimates. The results of [44] showed that for a certain Von Neumann algebra U, In [14] the researcher considered λ(M) defined as the smallest number Z 2 of Z that satisfy [Z * , Z] = M and showed that 1 ≤ λ(M) ≤ 2. Matej [28] estimated the distance of d 1 and d 2 to the generalized derivations and the normed algebra of P and considered the cases when P is an ultraprime, when d 1 = d 2 and P are ultrasemiprime and when P is a Von Neumann algebra we have the equation…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%