1960
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.42b2.264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal and Abnormal Growth at the Upper End of the Femur

Abstract: 1. A brief description is given of normal epiphysial growth of the human femur. 2. Some ways in which abnormality of the growth plates may affect the shape and length of the human femur are described. 3. The influence of the blood supply on growth is discussed with particular reference to the etiology and treatment of congenital coxa vara.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
2

Year Published

1969
1969
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The etiology of cam‐type deformities is unclear. Early hypotheses suggest that the deformity results from growth disturbances of the proximal femur (28–33); growth disturbances of the head and neck, such as a delayed separation of the common physis or an eccentric closure of the capital epiphysis, will affect the anterosuperior area of the head–neck junction and result in similar alterations to those seen in our study. Several anatomic variations were described that could correspond to the radiologic finding of a cam‐type deformity at the anterosuperior position of the proximal femur, including an osseous bar extending from the head to the superior tubercle of the intertrochanteric line described in 1899 (33, 34), an osseous prominence described as eminentia in 1904 (33–36), and concavities called imprints or cervical fossa in 1924 (34, 36).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The etiology of cam‐type deformities is unclear. Early hypotheses suggest that the deformity results from growth disturbances of the proximal femur (28–33); growth disturbances of the head and neck, such as a delayed separation of the common physis or an eccentric closure of the capital epiphysis, will affect the anterosuperior area of the head–neck junction and result in similar alterations to those seen in our study. Several anatomic variations were described that could correspond to the radiologic finding of a cam‐type deformity at the anterosuperior position of the proximal femur, including an osseous bar extending from the head to the superior tubercle of the intertrochanteric line described in 1899 (33, 34), an osseous prominence described as eminentia in 1904 (33–36), and concavities called imprints or cervical fossa in 1924 (34, 36).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It increases shortly after birth to about 145" at 18 months (Murakami 1959, Ravelli 1953. This infantile coxa valga is attributed to vigorous growth of the medial part of the crescentric growth plate in early infancy and lasts until the abductor muscles stimulate the development of the greater trochanter, when valgus decreases (Morgan and Somerville 1960). Valgus decreases to about 135" by the age of 6 years and remains stationary until adolescence, when there is a mild decrease to about 132" (Shands and Steele 1958).…”
Section: Femoral Inclinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note the left femur is shortened, slightly laterally bowed with some sclerosis in the diaphysis to the limb bud: however, the cause in the great majority of children remains unknown. Abnormality in development of the normal vascular pattern in the limb has been suggested by Morgan and Somerville [4], Hootnick et al [5] and more recently by Szeizel et al [6], who looked at the association between smoking during pregnancy and congenital limb deficiency. Although the major deficiency is usually in one segment of the limb, a lesser degree of shortening in the other segments of the limb, which adds to the overall length discrepancy is extremely common and must be recognized.…”
Section: Etiologymentioning
confidence: 94%