2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3030848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal-Based Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) for Solving 3D Point Set Registration via Rotation Optimization

Abstract: Compared with the registration methods based on local optimizations, the heuristic registration methods are less sensitive to the initial position, and a reasonable bound range is essential to ensure the registration validity. In practice, compared with a rotation bound range, which is periodic, the setting of the translation range is more difficult and manual interventions required, especially when the initial position is complex. Moreover, it has yet to be discussed in past research. Therefore, a normal-base… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shen et al, 2020: In [ 53 ], the authors propose an algorithm derived from the Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) [ 54 ] to register 3D cloud points. Traditional registration of 3D cloud points involves both translation and rotation on all three axes.…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shen et al, 2020: In [ 53 ], the authors propose an algorithm derived from the Flower Pollination Algorithm (FPA) [ 54 ] to register 3D cloud points. Traditional registration of 3D cloud points involves both translation and rotation on all three axes.…”
Section: Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flower grading based on machine vision has been studied by many researchers. Most of the publications are based on two-dimensional (2D) digital images and mainly focus on the defects, colors, and shapes of flowers [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. However, limited by its own dimensionality, it is difficult to obtain a flower's real morphology from a 2D image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%