2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0252-9602(12)60119-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal families of meromorphic functions sharing a holomorphic function and the converse of the Bloch principle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, one can ask what can be said about normality of family F if set S in Corollary 1.5 has cardinality equal to one. In this direction, we prove the following result which in turn extends the results of Yunbo and Zongsheng [13], Meng and Hu [6], Charak and Sharma [2] and Sun [10].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Further, one can ask what can be said about normality of family F if set S in Corollary 1.5 has cardinality equal to one. In this direction, we prove the following result which in turn extends the results of Yunbo and Zongsheng [13], Meng and Hu [6], Charak and Sharma [2] and Sun [10].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Like Bloch's principle, its converse is not true. For counterexamples one can see [2] [5], [10], [11], [14], [17], and [18].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Like Bloch's principle, its converse is not true. For counterexamples one can see [1], [8], [10], [16], [18], [20]. In order to construct counterexamples to the converse, one needs to prove a suitable normality criterion.…”
Section: Counterexamples To the Converse Of The Bloch's Principlementioning
confidence: 99%