2015
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a4258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal Fetal Posterior Fossa in MR Imaging: New Biometric Data and Possible Clinical Significance

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Posterior fossa malformations are a common finding in prenatal diagnosis. The objectives of this study are to re-evaluate existing normal MR imaging biometric data of the fetal posterior fossa, suggest and evaluate new parameters, and demonstrate the possible clinical applications of these data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23,24 Our study showed high intraobserver reproducibility (range, 0.79 -0.99) and high agreement between 2 radiologists (range, 0.71-1) for all biometric measurements in the 3 imaging modalities. Similar results were reported by Tilea et al 18 and by Ber et al 25 for MR imaging measurements of the posterior fossa.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…23,24 Our study showed high intraobserver reproducibility (range, 0.79 -0.99) and high agreement between 2 radiologists (range, 0.71-1) for all biometric measurements in the 3 imaging modalities. Similar results were reported by Tilea et al 18 and by Ber et al 25 for MR imaging measurements of the posterior fossa.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Hypoplasia was supported by semi-automatic measurement of the vermian cross-sectional area with reference to biometric data published by Ber et al [16]. According to this publication which suffers from low data density between 25 and 27 weeks‘gestation, vermian cross-sectional area in our first case was normal at the time of follow-up [16]. What is the clinical impact of confirming or excluding mild vermian hypoplasia and how confident can we be?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The Pearson correlation was used to assess the correlation for all evaluated parameters. T-tests were calculated to compare the relative brainstem areal contribution of the midbrain, pons, and medulla oblongata between fetuses in the first five evaluated GW (weeks [14][15][16][17][18] This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%