2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.97.045020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal gravity field in relativistic geodesy

Abstract: Modern geodesy is subject to a dramatic change from the Newtonian paradigm to Einstein's theory of general relativity. This is motivated by the ongoing advance in development of quantum sensors for applications in geodesy including quantum gravimeters and gradientometers, atomic clocks and fiber optics for making ultra-precise measurements of the geoid and multipolar structure of the Earth's gravitational field. At the same time, Very Long Baseline Interferometry, Satellite Laser Ranging and Global Navigation … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 88 publications
(239 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise determination of the Earth's geopotential field and orthometric height (OH) is a main task in geodesy (Mazurova et al, 2017(Mazurova et al, , 2012. With rapid development of time and frequency science, highprecision atomic clock manufacturing technology (Bloom et al, 2014;Hinkley et al, 2013;McGrew et al, 2018) provides an alternative way to precisely determine the geopotentials and OHs, which has been extensively discussed in recent years (Bondarescu et al, 2012;Lion et al, 2017;Shen et al, 2016Shen et al, , 2018, and opening a new era of time-frequency geoscience (Kopeikin et al, 2018;Shen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precise determination of the Earth's geopotential field and orthometric height (OH) is a main task in geodesy (Mazurova et al, 2017(Mazurova et al, , 2012. With rapid development of time and frequency science, highprecision atomic clock manufacturing technology (Bloom et al, 2014;Hinkley et al, 2013;McGrew et al, 2018) provides an alternative way to precisely determine the geopotentials and OHs, which has been extensively discussed in recent years (Bondarescu et al, 2012;Lion et al, 2017;Shen et al, 2016Shen et al, , 2018, and opening a new era of time-frequency geoscience (Kopeikin et al, 2018;Shen et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%