2014
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal mandibular growth and diagnosis of micrognathia at prenatal MRI

Abstract: Subjective identification of micrognathia may be limited. Reference data provide quantitative evaluation of mandibular size and position. An IFA <50° reflects micrognathia or retrognathia; a jaw index less than the fifth percentile suggests micrognathia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 The formation of the fetal mandible is a complex process where developmental anomalies occur infrequently. This fusion of tissues is governed by intricate interactions involving the branchial arches of the ectoderm and the cranial neural crest cells arising from the dorsal neural tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1,2 The formation of the fetal mandible is a complex process where developmental anomalies occur infrequently. This fusion of tissues is governed by intricate interactions involving the branchial arches of the ectoderm and the cranial neural crest cells arising from the dorsal neural tube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such anomaly is micrognathia, a condition defined by the presence of a small, abnormally positioned mandible that has a incidence of 1:1000 births. [1][2][3][7][8][9] Micrognathia can be also be associated with congenital heart disease and musculoskeletal malformations. [3][4][5] True micrognathia is believed to be the result of hypoplasia of cells of the neural crest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, Nemec et al [24] performed a retrospective study that aimed to diagnose micrognathia with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using previously established ultrasound diagnostic criteria. This study compared the MRI findings of 355 fetuses without facial abnormalities seen on ultrasound to 10 fetuses with postnatal or autopsy-confirmed mandibular abnormalities.…”
Section: Micrognathiamentioning
confidence: 99%