1991
DOI: 10.1002/mus.880140708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal maximal and minimal motor nerve conduction velocities in adults determined by a collision method

Abstract: Using a new collision method, we measured motor nerve conduction velocities of the ulnar nerve in the forearm and the action potential amplitude of the abductor digiti minimi muscle on 60 adults, ages 20 to 82 years and apparently free from diseases of the peripheral nervous system. Both maximal and minimal motor nerve conduction velocities were linear functions of age; 64.42-0.05 age and 60.45-0.12 age, respectively. The percentage of the minimal to the maximal motor nerve conduction velocities was expressed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Branches of common-stem presynaptic ®bers producing excitatory post synaptic potentials produce short-term synchronization, and the peak of the spike observed in the cross-interval histogram is one measure of the strength of the common inputs (Kirkwood and Sears 1978). Motor nerve conduction velocity declines with age (Arasaki et al 1991;Wagman and Lesse 1952), and one might speculate that the characteristics of the short-term synchronization peak might be less well-de®ned in older individuals as a result of declines in motor nerve conduction velocity. However, relative to the spinal cord-muscle distance, the declines in conduction velocity are small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Branches of common-stem presynaptic ®bers producing excitatory post synaptic potentials produce short-term synchronization, and the peak of the spike observed in the cross-interval histogram is one measure of the strength of the common inputs (Kirkwood and Sears 1978). Motor nerve conduction velocity declines with age (Arasaki et al 1991;Wagman and Lesse 1952), and one might speculate that the characteristics of the short-term synchronization peak might be less well-de®ned in older individuals as a result of declines in motor nerve conduction velocity. However, relative to the spinal cord-muscle distance, the declines in conduction velocity are small.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Usually, NCV is measured using a surface electrode (conventional conduction velocity, C‐CV). C‐CV does not optimally assess the overall conduction properties of a nerve, because it reflects mainly the fastest conducting subset of the alpha motor axon population 3. However, in its early stages, polyneuropathy does not affect nerves uniformly 4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard motor nerve conduction velocity of NCV , the conduction velocity found using equation (1), is calculated on the basis of the latency time difference between the administration of the stimulus until the start of the action potential, and reflects the fastest motor unit among compound action potentials [18]. In addition to this method, we also calculated nerve conduction velocity using a method that examines time difference from the cross-correlation of the various waves of the overall action potential waveform ( NCVCC ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%