1975
DOI: 10.1538/expanim1957.24.2_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal Prenatal Growth of the Golden Hamster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each species, age of embryos was plotted against embryo weight and a logarithmic relationship (shown in red) was deduced for a time period including the time period of interest in this study. For hamster, our data (in red) fitted with published data (in black, Lee et al 1975), except for two litters for which coı¨t time was obviously misestimated (see methods for details). Figure S3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each species, age of embryos was plotted against embryo weight and a logarithmic relationship (shown in red) was deduced for a time period including the time period of interest in this study. For hamster, our data (in red) fitted with published data (in black, Lee et al 1975), except for two litters for which coı¨t time was obviously misestimated (see methods for details). Figure S3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For hamster (6 litters), we had inconsistencies between weight or developmental stage as estimated from embryo features and the supposed age of the litter according to mating dates. Comparison with published data (Lee et al 1975) suggested two litters for which the age of gestation had obviously been overestimated ( Fig. S2).…”
Section: Weight To Time Conversionmentioning
confidence: 72%