Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects.

Boone, Donna C.; Azen, Stanley P.

doi:10.2106/00004623-197961050-00017

Cited by 580 publications

(363 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

316

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Overall, the findings from this study demonstrate that the S group, with the prosthesis, had less hip flexion motion of the affected limb than the OI group. They also had reduced motion compared with that of healthy persons reported elsewhere in the literature (AAOS 1965;Boone and Azen 1979;Roaas and Andersson 1982). The OI group, on the other hand, had flexion motion in line with normal values.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

Socket Versus Bone-Anchored Trans-Femoral Prostheses

Hagberg

Häggström

Uden

et al. 2005

Prosthetics &Amp; Orthotics International

153

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the first study to report on hip range of motion (ROM) among active prosthesis users, when wearing and not wearing a trans-femoral socket prosthesis and to compare with individuals rehabilitated with an osseointegrated bone-anchored prosthesis. In addition, discomfort when sitting with the prosthesis is reported in both groups. The study group all had a non-vascular amputation and were divided into those supplied with a socket prosthesis (S group) (n = 43, mean age 51 years, 74% men) or a bone-anchored prosthesis (OI group) (n = 20, mean age 46 years, 75% men). Active hip ROM was measured with a goniometer, and self-reported problems with discomfort when sitting were recorded. The hip motion decreased in all directions when wearing the socket prosthesis compared to without it (P 5 0.001 for all directions), and 37% of the subjects had less than 908 of hip flexion when wearing their prosthesis. Discomfort when sitting was reported among 44% (n = 19) in the S group and was more common among individuals with less than 908 of hip flexion motion (P = 0.025). In the OI group, no restriction in hip motion was measured with the prosthesis, and no subject had less than 908 of flexion and 5% (n = 1) reported discomfort when sitting. This study shows that a trans-femoral prosthetic socket significantly reduces the ROM of the hip and that discomfort when sitting is common among individuals wearing such prostheses. Further, the study confirms that individuals using a bone-anchored prosthesis have no restricted hip motion with the prosthesis and report very few problems with discomfort when sitting.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

Socket Versus Bone-Anchored Trans-Femoral Prostheses

Hagberg

Häggström

Uden

et al. 2005

Prosthetics &Amp; Orthotics International

153

112

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Currently, few comprehensive datasets detail the normal variation of active range of motion in healthy individuals and are limited by the number of joints assessed, 3 the age range of participants, 4,5 or insufficient sex representation. 6,7 …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Normative reference values for strength and flexibility of 1,000 children and adults

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To establish reference values for isometric strength of 12 muscle groups and flexibility of 13 joint movements in 1,000 children and adults and investigate the influence of demographic and anthropometric factors.Methods: A standardized reliable protocol of hand-held and fixed dynamometry for isometric strength of ankle, knee, hip, elbow, and shoulder musculature as well as goniometry for flexibility of the ankle, knee, hip, elbow, shoulder, and cervical spine was performed in an observational study investigating 1,000 healthy male and female participants aged 3-101 years. Correlation and multiple regression analyses were performed to identify factors independently associated with strength and flexibility of children, adolescents, adults, and older adults. Results:Normative reference values of 25 strength and flexibility measures were generated.Strong linear correlations between age and strength were identified in the first 2 decades of life. Muscle strength significantly decreased with age in older adults. Regression modeling identified increasing height as the most significant predictor of strength in children, higher body mass in adolescents, and male sex in adults and older adults. Joint flexibility gradually decreased with age, with little sex difference. Waist circumference was a significant predictor of variability in joint flexibility in adolescents, adults, and older adults. Conclusions:Reference values and associated age-and sex-stratified z scores generated from this study can be used to determine the presence and extent of impairments associated with neuromuscular and other neurologic disorders, monitor disease progression over time in natural history studies, and evaluate the effect of new treatments in clinical trials. Neurology ® 2017;88:36-43Meaningful, reliable, and sensitive outcome measures are required to monitor treatment and progression of neuromuscular and other neurologic disorders. While there have been substantial advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history of many neuromuscular disorders, the identification and development of new outcome measures that best reflect the efficacy of specific treatments have not advanced at the same rate. 1 Establishing valid and responsive outcome measures is a priority for the field. 2 To assist in the development of new outcome measures, normative reference values generated from large populations across the lifespan using standardized methods are required. Normative reference values can be utilized to generate z scores, which can be used in multicenter studies to improve outcome measure precision and responsiveness.Muscle weakness and joint contractures predispose to numerous pathologies requiring intervention. Reference data play an important role in identifying and quantifying these impairments and evaluating the effectiveness of interventions. Currently, few comprehensive datasets detail the normal variation of active range of motion in healthy individuals and are limited by the number of joints assessed, 3...

show abstract

“…Studies on normal physiologic hip Range Of Motion (ROM) have shown varied results with hip flexion and extension ranges of up to 150 degrees, as well as hip abduction and adduction ranges of up to 80 degrees [5][6]. It is also accepted that reaching a minimum ROM benchmark is required to achieve a good functional outcome post THA [5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Elevated Lip Liner Positions Improving Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty – An Experimental Study

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The use of elevated lip polyethylene liners with the acetabular component is relatively common in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Elevated lip liners increase stability of the THA by increasing the jump distance in one direction. However, the elevated lip, conversely, also reduces the primary arc in the opposite direction and leads to early impingement of the neck on the elevated lip, potentially causing instability.The aim of the present study is to determine the total range of motion of the femoral head component within the acetabular component with the elevated lip liner in different orientations within the acetabular cup.Methods: We introduce a novel experimental (ex-vivo) framework for studying the effects lip liner orientation on the range of motion of the femoral component. For constant acetabular cup orientation, the elevated lip liner was positioned superiorly and inferiorly. The femoral component range of motion in the coronal, sagittal and axial plane was measured. To avoid any confounding influences of out of plane motion, the femoral component was constrained to move in the tested plane.Results: This experimental set up introduces a rigorous framework in which to test the effects of elevated lip liner orientations on the range of motion of the femoral head component in abduction, adduction, flexion, extension and rotation. The movements of this experimental set-up are directly informative of patient's maximum potential postoperative range of motion. Initial results show that an in-

show abstract

Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects.

Cited by 580 publications

References 0 publications

Socket Versus Bone-Anchored Trans-Femoral Prostheses

Socket Versus Bone-Anchored Trans-Femoral Prostheses

Normative reference values for strength and flexibility of 1,000 children and adults

Elevated Lip Liner Positions Improving Stability in Total Hip Arthroplasty – An Experimental Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About