1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002570050220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal reflection effect on the critical current in a clean-limit superconductor-normal-metal-superconductor junction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of these coefficients depend on the material details of the junction. The CPRs of junctions with FWVM 46 and barriers 37,50,51 have been previously calculated (numerically) at zero magnetic field. The effect of both mechanisms is to make the CPR more closely resemble a sinusoidal curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values of these coefficients depend on the material details of the junction. The CPRs of junctions with FWVM 46 and barriers 37,50,51 have been previously calculated (numerically) at zero magnetic field. The effect of both mechanisms is to make the CPR more closely resemble a sinusoidal curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the general case, where FWVM and barriers are included at the S-N interfaces, the bound state energies and the continuum current must be calculated from the transmission matrix formalism 46 , in which the transmission matrix includes a normal (specular) reflection coefficient as well as an Andreev (retro) reflection coefficient. The values of these coefficients depend on the material details of the junction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because we impose a barrier potential at the SC/FM interfaces and include the Fermi velocity mismatch among different regions in numerical calculations, which remove all degeneracies in analytical results. The anti-crossing changes the period of the Josephson current at zero temperature, I s = 2e n ∂E n /∂φ with the sum-mation of negative Andreev levels, from 4π (black curves) to 2π [33,35]. The Josephson current for the Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The Josephson effect in ballistic superconductor/normal conductor/superconductor junctions can be described within the framework of phase-coherent Andreev reflection. [15][16][17][18] In the Andreev reflection process an electron incident from the normal conductor side on the normal conductor/ superconductor interface is retroreflected as a hole by creating a Cooper pair in the superconductor. 19 In the reverse process, a hole is retroreflected as an electron by annihilating a Cooper pair in the superconductor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%